Friday, June 19, 2026
Home Blog Page 19

Peter Obi Cries Out Over Brazen Demolition of Brother’s Property in Lagos: “This Is Not Justice – This Is Rascality”

In a scene that has shocked many Nigerians and drawn deep concern over the state of justice and property rights in the country, a property belonging to Next Foods Limited—a company majority-owned by Ndibe Obi, younger brother to former Anambra governor and Labour Party presidential candidate, Mr. Peter Obi—was violently invaded and partially demolished under highly suspicious circumstances.

It all began on Monday, June 23, 2025, when bulldozers rolled into 57 Oduduwa Crescent, Ikeja GRA, and started tearing down the building without prior notice to the owners. Shocked and distressed, Mr. Ndibe Obi, who had invested in the property since 2011 with no dispute or encumbrance for over a decade, made a frantic phone call to his elder brother.

En route to Abuja for a critical engagement, Peter Obi aborted his trip and flew back to Lagos the next morning. By 9:30 am on Tuesday, June 24, he arrived at the scene, only to find years of legitimate investment reduced to rubble. “How can this happen in a lawful society?” he asked, visibly shaken as he addressed the press after facing stiff resistance from individuals on the ground who were determined to silence the incident.

The murky legal process enabling demolition makes this ordeal even more painful. The demolition was purportedly based on a court order obtained by Deborah Olorunlogbon, who filed a case claiming ownership—but shockingly, the defendant in her suit was listed simply as an “unknown person.”

“How do you sue an unknown person over a known, developed property with a Certificate of Occupancy and valid ownership documents?” Obi asked, his voice trembling with indignation. “Can you see the rascality in this country? They sued a ghost and used that judgment to demolish a company’s legally owned property.”
Next Foods Limited’s lawyer, Barrister Emeka Okpoko, revealed that his team only became aware of the suit on Friday, June 20, just days before the demolition began. They immediately rushed to court to file applications for joinder and injunction, providing extensive documentation—a Deed of Assignment, Certificate of Occupation, and proof of purchase dating back to 2011, when the property was acquired for N280 million.

Okpoko said, “They never served us. They claimed they pasted a court process and took it down moments later to present fake evidence of service. We are in court now, fighting not just to stop this injustice, but to restore the dignity of due process in Nigeria.”
In a further twist that underscores the absurdity of the case, the longtime security guard, Babagana Abubakiri, who has watched over the property since 2011, was accused of “forcible entry” by the police on June 20 into a house he had legitimately protected for over 13 years.

This is not just about his family, but the nation’s soul for Peter Obi. “We’re crying to the world to see what is happening here. If people who’ve followed due process, paid legally for property, have valid documents, can be kicked out this way, then we are not safe—no Nigerian is.”
He called on the judiciary, the police, civil society, and all who still believe in justice to stand up and resist this creeping tyranny. “You cannot build a nation on impunity,” he said. “If this can happen to my brother, what will happen to the voiceless? To the struggling business owner with no connections? This is not about politics. This is about fairness, decency, and the sanctity of the law.”
Obi didn’t mince words about the larger implications. “We talk about attracting foreign investment, yet this is how we treat local investors who follow the law. This kind of lawlessness chases investment away. How can we convince the world we are ready for business when we treat property rights like a joke?”
The family has vowed to pursue every legal means to restore the property and hold the perpetrators accountable. But as the dust settles over the ruins on Oduduwa Crescent, one truth remains: this is more than a demolished building—it’s a brutal assault on trust, justice, and the idea of a safe Nigeria.

By Ikemefuna Ozobi

(Facebook)

Breaking: War Between Israel and Iran Has Ended Trump Announces

CONGRATULATIONS TO EVERYONE! It has been fully agreed by and between Israel and Iran that there will be a Complete and Total CEASEFIRE (in approximately 6 hours from now, when Israel and Iran have wound down and completed their in progress, final missions!), for 12 hours, at which point the War will be considered, ENDED! Officially, Iran will start the CEASEFIRE and, upon the 12th Hour, Israel will start the CEASEFIRE and, upon the 24th Hour, an Official END to THE 12 DAY WAR will be saluted by the World.

During each CEASEFIRE, the other side will remain PEACEFUL and

RESPECTFUL. On the assumption that everything works as it should, which it will, I would like to congratulate both Countries, Israel and Iran, on having the Stamina, Courage, and Intelligence to end, what should be called, “THE 12 DAY WAR.” This is a War that could have gone on for years, and destroyed the entire Middle East, but it didn’t, and never will! God bless Israel, God bless Iran, God bless the Middle East, God bless the United States of America, and GOD BLESS THE WORLD!

DONALD J. TRUMP,

PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

IF They Retaliate, It Would Be A Worst Mistake, We Can Fly In And Out Of Iran At Will – Marco Rubio

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has issued a stern warning to Iran following U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, stating that any retaliation would constitute the regime’s gravest error. His comments come as Iran’s foreign minister heads to Russia for consultations that could signal broader conflict escalation.

Speaking to Fox News, Rubio emphasized American military superiority and the precision of the nuclear facility strikes. He warned Iran against responding with force while clarifying that the United States does not seek broader war. “If they retaliate, it would be a worst mistake that they have ever made, we can fly in and out of Iran at will. We went in last night after the President sent the military in; at halfway across the world, we went in and conducted this operation. Not a shot was fired against us; they didn’t even know what had happened by the time we left, the planes out of their airspace before they started realizing that they have been hit,” Rubio stated during the interview.

The Secretary of State emphasized that retaliation would trigger overwhelming American response capabilities. “It will be a terrible mistake if Iran retaliates, but that is not our goal. We are not declaring war on Iran, but if they attack us, then I think we have capabilities that they haven’t even seen yet. It would be a terrible mistake on their part. And frankly, it is not what we hope for or wish.”

Rubio outlined the administration’s objectives regarding Iran’s nuclear program. “What we want now is to ensure that Iran never has nuclear weapons. If what they want is a civil nuclear program with power plants, like a lot of other countries in the world have, they can do that. That’s the deal we offered to them.”

He attributed the military action to Iran’s failure to engage diplomatically. “They rejected it; they tried to play us. They wouldn’t respond to our offers; they disappeared for ten days. The President had to take action as a response.”

Meanwhile, Iranian Foreign Affairs Minister Abbas Araghchi declared that the United States and Israel crossed a major red line by attacking Iran’s nuclear facilities. The Iranian diplomat announced plans for urgent consultations with Russian President Vladimir Putin, a development that could signal dangerous escalation.

Araghchi’s trip to Russia on Sunday raises concerns about potential coordination between Tehran and Moscow that could expand the conflict beyond the Middle East. The move suggests Iran may seek Russian support in responding to the American strikes.

Senate Investigates Mismanagement of N210trn by NNPC

The Nigerian Senate has issued a one-week ultimatum to the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL) to explain financial discrepancies amounting to over N210 trillion in its audited financial statements covering the period from 2017 to 2023.

The directive came during a charged session of the Senate Committee on Public Accounts on Wednesday, where NNPCL’s Chief Financial Officer, Dapo Segun, and other top company executives faced intense questioning from lawmakers.

Lawmakers described the alleged financial gaps as “mind-boggling,” citing glaring irregularities in figures recorded under accrued expenses and receivables in the company’s reports.

The committee chairman, Senator Aliyu Wadada, said the inconsistencies were “unacceptable,” warning that the Senate would fully exercise its oversight authority to uncover the truth.

We are looking at over N210tn in just two categories—accrued expenses and receivables. These are not mere rounding errors; they raise fundamental questions about transparency and financial integrity,” Wadada stated.

According to the Senate, the audited reports revealed accrued expenses of N103tn, which shockingly included N600bn in retention fees, unspecified legal fees, and auditor charges—all with no supporting documentation or referenced contracts.

“How do you quote N600bn in retention fees with no contract to back it up?
There are legal fees with no record of the legal services rendered. It’s completely unjustifiable,” Wadada queried.

Even more troubling was a N103tn figure under receivables, which lawmakers argued lacked explanation or breakdown.

According to the Senate, the audited reports revealed accrued expenses of N103tn, which shockingly included N600bn in retention fees, unspecified legal fees, and auditor charges—all with no supporting documentation or referenced contracts.

“How do you quote N600bn in retention fees with no contract to back it up?
There are legal fees with no record of the legal services rendered. It’s completely unjustifiable,” Wadada queried.

Even more troubling was a N103tn figure under receivables, which lawmakers argued lacked explanation or breakdown.

According to the Senate, the audited reports revealed accrued expenses of N103tn, which shockingly included N600bn in retention fees, unspecified legal fees, and auditor charges—all with no supporting documentation or referenced contracts.

“How do you quote N600bn in retention fees with no contract to back it up?
There are legal fees with no record of the legal services rendered. It’s completely unjustifiable,” Wadada queried.

Even more troubling was a N103tn figure under receivables, which lawmakers argued lacked explanation or breakdown.

According to the Senate, the audited reports revealed accrued expenses of N103tn, which shockingly included N600bn in retention fees, unspecified legal fees, and auditor charges—all with no supporting documentation or referenced contracts.

“How do you quote N600bn in retention fees with no contract to back it up?
There are legal fees with no record of the legal services rendered. It’s completely unjustifiable,” Wadada queried.

Even more troubling was a N103tn figure under receivables, which lawmakers argued lacked explanation or breakdown.

The committee also revealed that NNPCL submitted a revised document moments before the hearing—one that contradicted the original audited financials already in the public domain.

“The new document completely distorts the figures in the official audit. We find that not just ridiculous, but deeply troubling,” Wadada said.

He further questioned the credibility of the audit process, expressing concern that NNPCL finalized and signed off on its accounts while still internally reconciling massive financial figures.

How do you proceed to finalise audited accounts while still reconciling such massive figures? These aren’t internal memos; they’re public documents that potential investors will scrutinise,” he added.

To that effect, the committee submitted a list of 11 critical questions to NNPCL, demanding comprehensive written responses within one week.

Lawmakers emphasized that the probe is not a witch-hunt but a constitutional responsibility aimed at protecting public funds and enforcing financial discipline—especially in light of the federal government’s drive for increased revenue.

Wadada invoked President Bola Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda, saying it demands transparency and fiscal accountability at all levels.

In a country striving to change its national narrative, access to accurate and verifiable financial data is non-negotiable. These kinds of discrepancies sabotage that mission,” he stated.

NAPIMS Declares Profit, NNPCL Posts Loss

Adding to the controversy, the Senate discovered a major contradiction: between 2017 and 2021, National Petroleum Investment Management Services (NAPIMS)—a subsidiary of NNPCL—declared N9 trillion in profit, while the parent company, NNPCL, reported a N16 billion loss during the same period.

“How can a subsidiary report trillions in profit while the parent company bleeds losses?” Wadada asked.

The Senate has vowed to get to the root of the matter, using all legislative tools at its disposal.

“This isn’t just about balancing books—it’s about restoring trust in public institutions. Every single kobo must be accounted for,” Wadada concluded.

(Journalist101)

Court Closes Nnamdi Kanu Trial Today

The Federal Government on Thursday closed its case against the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, in the ongoing terrorism and treason trial.

Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court in Abuja fixed July 18 for Kanu to open his defence after the government concluded its case by calling five witnesses who testified to establish the charges brought against him.

However, there are strong indications that the IPOB leader may file a no-case submission on the grounds that he was not properly linked with the alleged charges levelled against him by the Federal Government.

Chief Adegboyega Awomolo, SAN, who led the prosecution team of the Federal Government, announced the closure of the case after the fifth prosecution witness (PW-5), identified as EEE for security reasons, was discharged from the witness box following cross-examination by one of Kanu’s lawyers, Dr Onyechi Ikpeazu, SAN.

According to Awomolo, the prosecution was satisfied that from the avalanche of evidence tendered, including broadcasts of activities of the IPOB leader, the Federal Government had sufficiently satisfied the need to close its case.

“I therefore close the case,” he said.

In response, the lead defence counsel, Chief Kanu Agabi, informed the court that they would be opting for a no-case submission, which would be filed in due course.

Earlier, in his evidence-in-chief, the fifth witness, who is an officer of the Department of State Services (DSS) at the headquarters in Abuja, said he was directed to lead a team of security officers to the southern region of the country to obtain records of activities that occurred between 2020 and 2021 relating to the End SARS protest.

According to the witness, his assignment included obtaining records of public properties that were destroyed and death certificates of security officers who died during the End SARS protest.

EEE was then shown three documents — the report of the End SARS assessments, the list of officers that died, and the death certificates of the officers — and after his confirmation, the prosecution counsel sought to tender same in evidence.

Ikpeazu, however, informed the court that the defence team would register their objection at the appropriate time, while the documents were subsequently admitted and marked as exhibits PWD2, PWD2A, and PWD2B respectively.

A summary of the documents revealed that a total of 128 policemen, 37 army officers, and 10 DSS agents were killed within the period.

Similarly, a total of 164 police stations were destroyed, as well as 19 facilities of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

Under cross-examination, EEE admitted that he was not involved in the investigation of the crimes allegedly committed by the defendant, but rather investigated the fallout of the End SARS protest, which the defendant enabled through his broadcasts.

When asked whether the entire End SARS protest was carried out because Kanu asked them to protest, the witness said he didn’t know, adding that he knew the defendant asked people to attack security officials and destroy public property.

Ikpeazu asked the witness:

“When people destroyed properties in Osun and Lagos states during the End SARS protest, are you saying they did that because the defendant asked them to? Are you saying categorically that the End SARS issue is a Biafran issue?”

The witness responded that his assignment was not to investigate Biafra, but to investigate the End SARS issue, to which the defendant incited the public.

He added that he had heard of Aisha Yesufu, one of the individuals who led the protest, but had never investigated her.

Ikpeazu further asked:

“Are you aware that the End SARS protest was chiefly against police brutality, especially by the SARS faction of the police?”

The witness replied:

“There are usually two causes of an insurrection: the open causes and the underlying causes. Police brutality could be the secondary cause of the protest. The real reason for the protests was that some subversive elements incited the public against the government. In this case, the defendant’s broadcasts were one of those underlying causes.”

EEE also stated that he did not know whether IPOB was concerned with happenings in places such as Lagos, Ibadan, Ile-Ife, and Igbajo. In response, Ikpeazu drew his attention to page 565 of the document, which was a report about what happened in Osun State during the End SARS protest. He pointed out a line that read:

“no life was lost in Ekiti State,”

To which the witness responded that he did not know whether Ekiti State was in Osun.

Exchange Rate: Naira to Dollar Rate as at Today

*DOLLAR TO NAIRA EXCHANGE RATE UPDATE*

As of today, June 17, 2025, the dollar to naira exchange rate stands at approximately:

– 1 USD = 1,543.60 NGN

Rates are subject to fluctuation and may vary depending on market conditions.

Bvi Channel One

Air India Plane crash Exposed The Conspiracy Of 9/11

When the Air India plane crashed into a relatively ordinary building, the structure remained mostly intact — made of just concrete and bricks. Even the tail and wreckage of the aircraft were clearly visible.

But during the 9/11 incident, when the airplane hit the World Trade Center (WTC), the entire building collapsed all the way to the ground. We’re talking about a heavily reinforced steel-and-concrete skyscraper. Not one, but three buildings collapsed — and strangely, the third building (WTC 7) wasn’t even directly hit by a plane, yet it came down in a similar manner.

To make it even more suspicious, there was no trace of the airplane debris — no wings, no tail, no seats — just pulverized dust. And somehow, a passport belonging to one of the hijackers was magically recovered intact, supposedly ejected from the inferno. And yet, people still believed the official story.

It makes you wonder — were people just conditioned not to ask questions, or was it something deeper?

If a plane crash typically leaves behind large visible wreckage — wings, tail, engines, debris — how did two massive commercial jets completely vanish into dust upon hitting the Twin Towers, leaving almost no aircraft remnants behind, yet a hijacker’s paper passport was found unscathed and intact near Ground Zero?

 

Judge Orders Nnamdi Kanu’s Trial to be Relocated to DSS Headquarters

The trial of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), took a dramatic turn on Friday as Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court in Abuja ordered court proceedings to be temporarily relocated to the Department of State Services (DSS) headquarters.

The move was made to facilitate an on-site inspection of critical evidence linked to the case—specifically, a shipping container reportedly used to import a radio transmitter into Nigeria for broadcasts on Radio Biafra.
The judge and the legal teams travelled to the DSS facility to examine the container, which is considered central to the allegations against Kanu.
According to court sources, the transmitter in question was allegedly used by Kanu for IPOB-related broadcasts prior to his arrest.

The inspection marks a significant development in the high-profile case and could influence the trajectory of the trial moving forward. Further court proceedings are expected to continue following the inspection.

(Journalist101)

The Politics of Road Construction in Anambra State and Second Tenure Campaign- Anaenugwu Ndubuisi

An average Anambra person does not expect much from the people in Government. Ever since the genocidal war which ended in 1970, the mindset of an average Anambra person is to struggle to survive. Personal survival becomes the order of the day! The generation that tested the visionary leadership of Dr Michael Okpara was  traumatized with the horror of Biafra – Nigeria war and have to survive by playing politics of praise singing  to remain relevant in Nigeria power game. Let’s be clear without any ambiguity, the primary purpose of Government as captured in  section 14 (2) b of Nigerian constitution is to provide security and social welfare .

Prof Chukwuma Soludo being a renowned Professor of economics came into the scene with Dubai- Taiwan mantra promising to create at least 130,000 jobs annually . Of course, we trusted him as former CBN Governor with global links in several financial institutions of the world. One would have expected Mr Governor to bring the world to Anambra State to provide the people of Anambra with affordable housing, affordable and steady electricity, surplus and cheap food as well as highly motivated public and civil servants. However, Prof Soludo ”major” achievement in the last three years is building roads and bridges across all the local governments in Anambra State including funcity and new government house. Kudos to Soludo administration for the fit he has achieved in road construction. There was a time in Anambra State when paying salaries is part of campaign achievement. But, after Peter Obi administration, paying salary of civil servants was no longer an issue. Because of low quality jobs done on road construction by two previous administration(s), most roads in State have collapsed, begging for immediate attention including new once, hence the need to play the politics of road construction which is not entirely bad.

Road construction is often heralded as a symbol of progress, development, and good governance. However, in many political contexts—especially in developing nations—it is also a deeply strategic and politicized act, intricately linked to re-election ambitions. As elections approach, roads suddenly appear where none existed, and dormant projects spring to life. This phenomenon speaks volumes about the intersection between infrastructure development and political survival, particularly the quest for a second tenure.

Roads as Political Capital

Roads serve both a functional and symbolic purpose. They enhance connectivity, boost local economies, and improve access to social services. But politically, they are visible, tangible signs of “development” that politicians can point to as evidence of performance.

In contexts where accountability mechanisms are weak, and voters rely heavily on physical signs of progress, road construction becomes a convenient campaign tool. Politicians leverage roads to: demonstrate achievements during their first term; reward loyal constituencies.

But, Timing is everything. Strategy development attracts economic growth, increases the general well-being of the people as well as create happiness among the populace. This is not the case of the sudden accelerated road projects in the election year, often dubbed –electoral roads .Why all this fanfare for completing a road with tax payers’ money? Emptiness and lack of vision could be the main reason most Governor throw party for building public infrastructure

Selective Construction and Strategic Neglect

Not all roads are created equal—politically speaking. Resource allocation often reflects electoral calculations more than equitable development needs. Some characteristics of politically motivated road construction include: favoring vote-rich areas that can swing elections, ignoring opposition strongholds, using roads as bargaining chips for endorsements or political alliances, awarding contracts to cronies who fund campaign machinery among others. In some instances, roads are left incomplete or shoddily built, only to be re-awarded at inflated costs during the next campaign cycle.

The “Second Tenure Syndrome”

The first tenure is often a preparatory phase—setting the stage for re-election. For many incumbents, the second tenure campaign becomes a make-or-break moment. The urgency to show results intensifies, and road construction takes center stage in campaign rhetoric:

“Look at the roads we’ve built” becomes a staple line in campaign speeches

Billboards display before-and-after images of highways

State media highlight road projects in weekly performance scorecards

This strategy often works because roads are easier to communicate to the electorate than abstract reforms in governance or long-term economic policies.

Challenges and Consequences

While road construction can indeed bring real benefits, its politicization also raises serious concerns:

1. Misallocation of resources – Projects are not always based on actual needs but on electoral gain.

2. Short-termism – Focus is on quick wins rather than durable, strategic infrastructure.

3. Corruption – Contracts are often inflated or awarded without transparency.

4. Poor quality roads – Rushed projects may not meet technical standards.

5. Neglect of other sectors – Health, education, and job creation may be sidelined.

A Way Forward

To improve the general well-being of the people, the incoming Governor of Anambra State should desist from building political roads and concentration on reforms that will ensure prompt public service delivery, highly motivated workforces as well as creating a productive environment where rule of law is the guiding principle. Strategic road construction should be intentional and will come with master plan for short term and long term plan covering the areas like housing villages and communities, industrial and agricultural areas, markets and business locations. When a Governor inspires the people, they will join hands with him to build a modern society. When Soludo administration was about to be inaugurated four years, not less than 10,000 professionals offered to serve the State pro bono but after the swearing in, those who indicated interest to serve were never contacted. Going forward, the incoming Governor should encourage those with passion and change agents to volunteer their services to the State in the areas of urban and rural planning, food production, voter education, functional education , housing , health etc.
Ultimately, infrastructure should serve the people—not just the political ambitions of those in power.

Conclusion

The politics of road construction reveals much about how development is used—and often abused—for electoral gain. While roads are essential, their politicization can distort priorities, breed inefficiency, and undermine trust in governance. As voters become more discerning, there is hope that performance in office—not campaign theatrics—will become the true road to second tenure. Politics of human development, good governance and lifting people out of poverty should be encouraged as Government has capacity to fix everything with massive support of the people.

Anaenugwu Ndubuisi
GGM Ambassador General

Anambra Govt Imposes N50M Levy On Political Opponents

The 16 governorship candidates participating in the Anambra 2025 election are to pay the sum of N50 million, each, before they can commence campaigns in the state.

The Anambra State Signage and Advertising Agency (ANSAA) stated this on Wednesday during a press conference. It said the payment would allow them paste posters, host billboards and parade branded cars, vests and other campaign activities.

The Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of the agency, Mr Tony Ujubuonu who addressed journalists in Awka said all the political parties fielding candidates for the election, including Governor Chukwuma Soludo would pay the fee. He said the decision is not targeted at any political party.

The permit comes with a statutory fee of Fifty Million Naira (N50,000,000) only, payable to the Anambra State government account.

“This campaign fee grants the parties the right to deploy their campaign materials and activities using posters, public address system, branded vehicles, banners, fliers, bunting, T-shirts,caps, street storms, rallies and sundry in location across the cities, villages and communities in the 21 local government areas of the state.

“What we have done is to maintain professional standards in the use of public advertising. This permit is to ensure orderliness, prevent visual pollution and create a level playing ground.”

He said the agency was created by Anambra State government in 2010 and established by law for the purpose of regulating the use of out-of-home advertising structures and control outdoor advertising.

Campaigns for the Anambra governorship election commenced on Wednesday, according to the guidelines released by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

The governorship election will hold on November 8, 2025. According to INEC, a total of 16 political parties are fielding candidates in the election.