Ifeanyi Okonkwo To Remain In EFCC Custody As His Arraignment Suffers A Setback

By

-

January 29, 2020

ifeanyi Okonkwo

Chief. Ifeanyi Okonkwo, is to spend more days with the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, as attempt by the anti graft agency to arraign him hit the rocks on Tuesday following the decision of the judge to disqualify herself from the matter.

the former guber candidate in Anambra state was to be arraigned by the EFCC on a one-count charge of obtaining by false pretense.

However, Justice A. O. Anidi of Enugu State High Court 2 disqualified herself from the suit brought before her court by the Commission against the social crusader, Mr. Ifeanyi Okonkwo.

Mr. Okonkwo, who represented himself in court, contested the jurisdiction of the court to entertain the matter on the grounds that it bothered on contractual matter, which was beyond the powers of EFCC.

He further notified the court that he has a pending matter against the EFCC at the Federal High Court and so, the commission cannot resort to self help by bringing him to another High Court.

Consequently, Justice Anidi disqualified herself from hearing the case for want of jurisdiction.

Following the ruling of the judge, Okonkwo was taken back into EFCC custody where he has been for eight days now.

It was further gathered that the EFCC had denied him access to his phones since his arrest on January 21st, 2020.

Okonkwo acted as the agent in the sale of a property belonging to Ifemeluma and Company Enterprises Nigeria Limited at Emene Industrial Estate, Enugu, which was acquired by the Chairman of Peace Mass Transit, Dr. Maduka Onyishi.

However, some aggrieved members of the polygamous Ifemeluma family, later went to court to challenge the multi-million naira transaction.

source: journalist101

IMO, IHEDIOHA v UZODIMMA: HOW DID WE GET HERE?By Clem Aguiyi

By

bvichannel1

-

January 29, 2020

- The constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 as amended vested the judicial power of the federation and the states in the courts established by the constitution of which the Supreme Court is the apex court. Supreme Court decisions ought to be final except in rare cases where it decides to review or reverse itself, and there must be reasonable grounds for this.
  
  My heart bled and I wept for Nigeria when for the first time in our history thousands of citizens across the country took to the streets to protest against the Supreme Court of Nigeria, thereby raising the question, how did we get here? The image of the Judiciary is currently at its lowest point and people are no longer happy. Allowing the judiciary to slide down this further means danger, danger and danger for the republic.
  
  I have heard the argument advanced by some people on why the Supreme Court cannot revisit, review or reverse its decision in the case of Ihedioha v Uzodimma because there must be an end to litigation. I for one do not subscribe to endless litigations. However, here is my humble take; ‘If the Supreme Court had sentenced a man to death to die by hanging and before the execution of that judgement, new facts capable of exonerating the convict emerged. Should the Supreme Court in the face of new and credible evidence allow the innocent man to die by hanging? I will expect the Supreme Court to find a way to reverse itself even without prompting. The Justices of the Supreme Court are not God. They are not angels. They are humans and are capable of making mistakes. In this case I believe some fatal mistakes were made. The injustice done on Ihedioha is too obvious to be ignored.’ Justice should not be made too tall to get. If justice becomes too tall to get , peace and stability which are necessary for the development of any society will become too tall to achieve.
  
  Removing a governor or president from office in our political constitution is equivalent to death because the will of the people is not just altered, it is buried and thrown into hell and uncertain future from which it may never be able to resurrect. This is why Imo is in grief following the unjust judgement. What you see on the streets and in people faces are sadness, anger, sorrow, anguish, weeping and crying. No judgement has broken the hearts of people like the January 14 Supreme Court Judgement. To them what happened was equivalent to death.
  
  By the time this piece is read, Emeka Ihedioha may have returned to the Supreme Court to seek a review of the judgment that removed him from office.Recall that the Supreme Court ruled on January 14 that INEC should withdraw the certificate of return issued to Emeka Ihedioha of the People’s Democratic Party as the winner of the contest and thus Governor of Imo State and hand same over to Hope Uzodimma of the All Progressives Congress. It asserted that Uzodimma scored the highest votes and should immediately be sworn as governor.
  
  Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun read the lead judgement of the unanimous verdict of the court. The Supreme Court based its ruling on the evidence brought by a police officer DCP Husseini that testified at the Appeal Court as PW-54. DCP Husseini brought election results from 388 polling units that the court said were excluded unlawfully from the overall collated results. Votes from the 388 polling units amounted to 213 295 and they all strangely went to Mr. Uzodimma.
  
  INEC records show that Imo State had 3, 523 polling units. Its initial result credited Uzodimma with 96, 458 votes from 3, 135 polling units. Kekere-Ekun directed the addition of the cooked 213, 295 votes from 388 polling units to the 96, 458 votes earlier accredited to Uzodimma. It then took Uzodimma’s tally to 309, 753.
  
  The result posed a significant challenge, however. With the new calculation by the Supreme Court, Imo State then had the dubious distinction of an election result ordered by the Supreme Court where votes allotted exceeded the number of accredited voters. It remains a sore point and source of embarrassment regarding the Supreme Court’s decision. The singular fact that our Supreme Court couldn’t add the maths and the fact that such an error could escape the eyes of a panel of seven judges remains a mystery. Poor quality judgments emanating from our court is hurting the image of this country. We are now a laughing stock and butt of jokes amongst civilized nations.
  
  There are also other troubling aspects of the judgement. For instance, the Supreme Court showed inconsistency in the way to admitted evidence. The Supreme Court gave probative value to the proof of evidence of PW-54, a police officer, thus relying on an uncertified public document Form EC8A. The electoral law recognizes only INEC and its staff for certifying election results. The Supreme Court overruled INEC and the lower courts and admitted the document brought by a witness who ordinarily does not qualify to present election results. This is turning the evidence Act upside down especially given that the same Supreme Court took a different stance in the recent case of Atiku v Buhari.
  
  There are many ramifications of the Supreme Court ruling. For one, it means that public documents do not need certification for acceptance in transactions, with the Supreme Court judgement as evidence. It means an investor may lose his real estate investment because someone or group came up with purported copies of title documents without certification from the Lands Registry on it. Such a scenario could happen even if the investor holds the original document. If this judgement is allowed to stand it means the Supreme Court has inadvertently opened the door for lower quality of documentary evidence to be admissible in our courts. Or will they ring-fence the Imo judgement so that no one can cite it?
  
  Perhaps, all the mistakes made in the instant case was occasioned by the speed the matter was treated. Now that the matter has been brought again to the attention of the Court, though not as an appeal but for discretional review, my lords should take their time to view the new facts with an open mind. If they can convince themselves that they were scammed, they should not only reverse themselves but also criminally deal with the persons behind the scam.

Early Church and the Igbos- Chijioke Ngobili

By

Queen Madu

-

January 29, 2020

Having striven unsuccessfully for 33 years between 1857 & 1890—contrary to their earlier boasting—to convert the Igbo in mass to christianity, the missionaries (CMS, RCM, Methodist, Presbyterian) grew frustrated and became desperate to do EVERYTHING POSSIBLE, good or bad, to advance their ambition and scheme. To catalyse this desperation to convert the Igbo in mass was the bitter rivalry between the CMS and RCM at Ọnịcha and also in their head offices at London and Rome. To position themselves for the desperate and hook-and-crook agenda ahead of the coming 20th century, the Romanists (catholics) replaced the Frenchman, Fr Joseph Lutz with an Irishman, Ignatius Shanahan as the British traders and colonists had bitterly requested in resistance of having Frenchmen leading in their territories. On the part of the CMS, Bishop Ajayi Crowther was hounded by the white racist priests under him who began to challenge him openly even as their London head office connived in diminishing his episcopal powers. It was a ploy to quicken the old man’s death who was about approaching his early 80s. And they succeeded. Ajayi died in 1891. With speed, Ajayi was replaced by a bishop who served very briefly before he died. Strategically, a stronger and healthier British man who could match Ignatius Shanahan in the battle for the Igbo souls was ordained bishop and deployed to Ọnịcha with immediate effect. His name was Herbert Tugwell. The CMS also added another fierce man to assist Tugwell. His name was Rev. Thomas John Dennis. The RCM too equipped themselves with such fierce persons as Fr Bubbendorf. The whole matrix at Ọnịcha was then an allwhite affair and predominantly British/Irish-led. The battle for the heart of Igboland was now ready to begin ahead of the much talked-about 20th century!

But with all these reshuffle, reorganisation and reordering, the missionaries still felt frustrated in their penetration of the Igboland beyond Ọnịcha, Obosi, and Ogidi. They were all bitter rivals and quarreled among themselves denominationally. But they were united in the realisation that there has to be some application of violent force to subdue and intimidate the Igbo into accepting christianity and abandoning their indigenous religion. At that realisation, they became one with their colonial brothers who were planning violent invasion and expedition of the Igbo interiors to bring the Igbo firmly under British government.

Desperate to support Ralph Moor, the leader of the bloody invasion and expeditions as well as Gallwey and Montanaro who led other army columns, the catholic missionaries rushed and sent a memo to its leadership in Paris saying firmly “This war is necessary”. The biggest role of the missionaries in the expedition was gathering intelligence for the soldiers while they pretended to be preaching the gospel in the interiors. The CMS, RCM, Methodist, Presbyterians — all became intelligence officers and supplied information to the soldiers, exaggerating their findings most times. More desperate to have this war executed, some of the missionaries even supported the military materially and fooled the natives they preached telling them that the little gossips they hear of the oncoming war were lies and won’t happen. Arọchukwu was the biggest target as it was believed that once the Chukwu deity and institution was destroyed and the resistors mowed down with guns, the rest of Igboland will be soaked in fear to surrender both land and religion. All the missionaries agreed with the British colonialists to start with Arọchukwu. Thus, on 1st December, 1901, the British attacked the Igboland from Arọchukwu. Arọ people resisted the invasion and paid with many lives until the expedition ended on 24th March, 1902. Then, other parts of Igboland were faced for invasion and conquest for the next 17 years.

Happily, the missionaries moved in to take advantage of the fears of the Igbo people who hadn’t seen or expected such superior military firepower on their peaceful spaces. The missionaries promised to protect communities from the invasion of soldiers and provided care to the wounded persons. But that was all part of the grand plan with the colonial invaders: STRIKE FEAR INTO THEM WITH VIOLENCE AND WE MOVE IN TO GIVE THEM SUCCOUR BASED ON THE CONDITION OF CONVERSION. In that circumstance, the missionaries moved with the greatest masterstroke of only protecting those who admit to be baptised and remain consistent in attending church activities. Defenceless, most Igbo people rushed to the church for protection and believed that the presence of the missionaries will protect their communities from being invaded or shelled like Arọ, Abam and other communities in the Bende axis. For example, Ogidi people entrusted their native republican leadership into the hands of Walter Okafọ Amobi who was a British trade agent as well as a CMS agent, in the hope that he’d help ward off the soldiers from attacking Ogidi being that he was the first Ogidi man to know the Whiteman. Walter would mischievously take advantage of this and went on to become a warrant chief, introduced the fake monarchy (Igweship) in Ogidi and other parts of Anambra, ruling the people with heavy hand from 1904-1925, forced men to labour for nothing and also snatched people’s wives to add to the retinue of the over 50 wives he married during his reign.

As the first decade of the 20th century progressed into the second, the British colonialists, in connivance with the missionaries, consolidated their conquest of Igboland in grand style. The introduction of Forced Labour and Prisons helped the process. The building of the rail tracks, carrying colonial officers and missionaries on hammock for hours along bush paths, clearing long miles of roads and other forms of unpaid labour were so much that many young and middle-aged men were breaking down in the face of the unending recruitments which prevented them from working on their farms to feed their families. The treacherous missionaries knew the plan and had an agreement with the government not to recruit the converts. And so, only the non-converts who were called “heathens” were forced to labour for weeks and days without seeing their families. The wearied ones resorted to going to church to see if they could escape the predicament for the meantime. But the missionaries were ruthless. They subjected them to taking catechisms and threatened them with ejection if they absented from church or returned to their indigenous faith. To make this more formidable, the middle-aged and old men who were desperate to evade unending labour were forced to bring their Ọfọ, Ikenga, Okposi for destruction at the churches or risk being rejected as converts, thus putting the final nail on the coffins of their indigenous religion. In this way and other subtle ways of instilling fear, the missionaries penetrated the Igbo more than ever between 1902 and 1920s, destroying the foundations of the indigenous social order to build theirs. In their words of justification and unified goal with the government: “pull down the fabric of the native society in order to build on the ruins”.

For the ignorant Igbo christian who is unteachable and overloaded with dogma, the missionaries were amazing and thought the best for the Igbo. But for the enlightened, freeminded Igbo who is ready to understand and appreciate the experience of his ancestors whose stories were unwritten and were overwhelmed by the ‘victorious’ narratives of the missionaries, there is no difference between the merchants, colonialists and the missionaries who worked together with them not primarily for the benefit of the Igbo but for the utmost agenda of advancing their country’s economic well-being and material prosperity using Soft Power behind the Hard Power of the colonialists.

How I wish one million Igbo persons between the ages of 25 and 40 would read F K Ekechi’s Missionary Enterprise and Rivalry in Igboland. If I had money or knew anyone who would sponsor it, I would print the ‘hidden’ book into 1 million copies and share freely to 1 million freeminded Igbo young persons who desire to understand how their ancestors were broken despite their resistance — those young Igbo who are wary of the danger of the single stories of missionaries presenting themselves as amazing, blameless people who did all amazing things and rescued us from “darkness”. Every Igbo below 40 years should, before he or she dies, read more than once Ekechi’s monumental book which has been intentionally hidden away from succeeding Igbo generations for many years!

©Chijioke Ngobili, 2020

Why I resigned as Imo PDP chairman – _Ezekwem_

By

bvichannel1

-

January 29, 2020

Why I resigned as Imo PDP chairman* – _Ezekwem_

Charles Ezekwem has said that he resigned as the chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party in Imo State because of a conspiracy to disgrace him out office after the Supreme Court judgment that sacked Emeka Ihedioha and announced Hope Uzodinma as the duly elected governor of the state.

Ezekwem, who spoke to journalists in Owerri on Tuesday, said that he resigned in order to protect his political career.

He said that he didn’t resign because of issues relating to his welfare as the party’s helmsman but to save his political career.

He said “There was a conspiracy to disgrace me out of office two days to the Supreme Court judgment. They contacted somebody who will replace me but the plot licked.

“I was treated like a stranger in a house I was supposed to be the head. The state secretary will fix a meeting in government and just send a text when I was supposed to be the one who should instruct him to fix a meeting.

“I didn’t resign because of my welfare as the party chairman. I resigned to save my political career. They wanted to remove me before my tenure expires in August. They wanted another person to be in charge of LGA congress in April. As a member of the NEC, I addressed my resignation letter to the national chairman of the PDP.

“Gerald Irona, who was the deputy governor to Emeka Ihedioha, told my people that as long as they are following me, they will never get any appointment in government. After I worked very hard to install a governor in Imo State after many years of opposition I was treated like a stranger. There was nothing they were doing in the government I knew.

“I revived the party in Imo State and preached the message of free-and-fair primary. Imo people know and saw what I did but I was left out of everything they were doing in government.”

Ihedioha To Return …….Ogu Nwadike

By

bvichannel1

-

January 28, 2020

40 REASONS WHY SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA SHOULD REINSTATE IHEDIOHA IN IMO STATE

By Ogu Bundu Nwadike, M.A

1. His Excellency, Rt. Hon. Emeka Ihedioha campaigned very well across Imo State and became a household name in Imo State for the 2019 election.

2. No other contestant campaigned in Imo State in the real sense of campaigning and none is a household name as Ihedioha.

3. Gov. Ihedioha secured the highest number of votes cast in the election, 273,404, winning outrightly in 12 local government areas and Performing relatively well in other 15 local government areas.

4. INEC declared Ihedioha the governor-elect on their set standard and reasons of his higher number of votes over the other candidates.

5. Three of the candidates in the election made petition to the Tribunal seeking for cancellation of the election, rerun election, and addition of excluded votes from 388 polling units.

6. The Tribunal after full five months of hearing the petition dismissed it for lack of merit and competence, because none of the petitioners could prove his claims.

7. The claim of exclusion of votes from 388 polling units turned out to be the most dramatic petition of all because nobody including the petitioner and his witnesses could prove the locations of the 388 polling units and the votes cast in them.

8. The INEC on oath pointedly disclaimed the 388 polling units, stating that they as electoral umpires didn’t know anything about the polling units.

9. The petitioners, not satisfied with the ruling by the Tribunal, appealed it at the Court of Appeal.

10. The appeal by the candidate making claims to excluded votes from 388 polling units was once again dramatic as the petitioner could still not provide evidence and proof of the existence of the 388 polling units, there locations and total number of votes cast in them. He could also not show the number of votes got by the various candidates in the election.

11. After full two months of work on the appeal, the Court of Appeal ruled that the Tribunal was right in its judgement and upheld the election of Gov. Ihedioha as due and legal. Therefore, the appellate court dismissed all the appeals .

12. The petitioners/appellants took their matter to the Supreme Court.

13. While in the Supreme Court, one of the candidates was disqualified by the Supreme Court on a separate matter bothering on double-nomination candidacy. That candidate was proved beyond reasonable doubts to have ran the election with the nomination and candidature of two different parties. That candidate got 190,364 votes in the election. His votes were consequently expunged by INEC.

14. However, there was another candidate that ran the election on the nomination of the same party for which the other candidate was disqualified. This raised the debate on whether it was the candidate that was disqualified or his party in the election. Could a party nominate and present two candidates for the same position in the same election? The popular answer was in the negative.

15. When, on January 15, 2020, the Supreme Court was to deliver its judgement on the appeals, it upheld the one party two candidates regime and went on to rule that the same controversial candidate won the election.

16. The Supreme Court based its judgement on its reasoning that the Tribunal and Court of Appeal aired in law by dismissing the claim by the petitioner/appellant that his votes from 388 polling units were excluded.

17. The Supreme Court went on to award 213,258 votes to the petitioner/appellant as his votes that were excluded from the 388 polling units.

18. The candidate that the Supreme Court awarded the 213,258 votes was fourth in the March 9, 2019 having got 96,456 votes. Together therefore, he ended getting 309,714 votes.

19. The notion of the total number of votes from the 388 polling units as 213,258 was first heard in the Supreme Court judgement.

20. The Tribunal and Court of Appeal didn’t know about the 213,258 earlier because the claimant couldn’t prove anything about the 388 polling units and his claimed excluded votes.

21. The petioner/appellant that the Supreme Court judgement favoured based on the supposed excluded 213,258 votes never knew how many votes he was claiming from the 388 polling units.

22. It is still a burning issue now how the Supreme Court counted and got to know that the excluded votes were 213,258 without the prior knowledge of INEC, the electoral umpires and the petitioner himself.

21. It is also contentious how it was only the 388 polling units excluded votes petitioner that the Supreme Court awarded 213,258 votes without a single vote to any of the rest of the 69 contestants in the election.

22. The question now is, was it only the candidate that the Supreme Court awarded 213,258 votes to that got votes in the 388 polling units? Is that humanly possible?

23. The petitioner and his witnesses at the Tribunal and Court of Appeal couldn’t read the document he presented, that was not certified or confirmed by INEC any way.

24. How then was the Supreme Court able to read the document and determine the total number of votes as 213,258, which the Tribunal for five months could not read and determine the total number of votes from the 388 polling units?

25. The whole unilateral mathematics by the Supreme Court that led to their awarding 213,258 controversial supposed excluded votes turned out to have produced wrong answers.

26. The total number of accredited voters in the governorship election in Imo State in 2019 was 823,743 but with the Supreme Court’s wrong mathematics, the total number of votes cast rose to 950,952, leaving an excess of 127,209 votes that were not accredited.

27. From the wrong mathematics answer by the Supreme Court, the 388 polling units produced 213,258 votes for only one candidate. That gave an average of 550 votes per polling unit.

28. The law is that the maximum number of voters in each polling unit is 500. But in the controversial 388 polling units, each had 550 for only one candidate. When the votes got by the other candidates are added, the total number of voters in each polling unit among the 388 polling units will be more than 550 votes. That’s outrageous!

29. From the foregoing, the Supreme Court need to help Nigerians clarify the confusions over the contentious judgement it gave on January 15, 2020!

30. The respondent that was returned as duly elected by the people of Imo State with the highest number of validly cast votes, certified and confirmed by the INEC, the Tribunal and the Court of Appeal, Gov. Ihedioha, promptly rejected the judgement by the Supreme Court.

31. The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has since also stated it rejects the judgement by the Supreme Court and called for its reversal to reinstate their candidate who was the authentic winner of the election.

32. Apparently, the Supreme Court played politics with justice, dabbling into aspects of judicial process that was not within its jurisdiction to deliberate on, like counting of votes that were claimed by a candidate to have been excluded in an election.

33. The Supreme Court has questions to answer over its delivery of injustice instead of justice in the appeals brought before it by petitioners in the 2019 governorship election, clearly won by Gov. Emeka Ihedioha.

34. Were there any 388 polling units in the election whose votes were excluded? In what places were the 388 polling units located?

35. Were there any votes cast in the 388 polling units? Where are the result sheets as were had in and for other polling units in the same election?

36. If the Supreme Court judgement winner got 213,258 votes from the 388 polling units, what were the votes of the other candidates? Or was the election in the 388 polling only for the Supreme Court judgement winner alone?

37. If the total number of accredited voters was 823,743, how come there was 950,952 votes cast in the election after the Supreme Court awarded 213,258 votes to its winner?

38. After disqualifying a candidate for double-nomination candidacy, should the party he represented still have another candidate that was not duly recognized by INEC, the electoral umpires?

39. After the disqualification of a candidate from the election for irregularities of culpable complicity for double-nomination candidacy, with his votes expunged, did Gov. Ihedioha automatically secured required 25% votes in 22 local government areas or not?

40. Legal jingoism and established errors and mistakes of the Supreme Court judgement notwithstanding, the foregoing are few cogent reasons why Gov. Ihedioha should, as a matter of fact, be reinstated without further delays, if the Supreme Court still has the interest of sustainable democracy and the respectable judiciary in Nigeria at heart. Thank you.

ReplyForward

Buhari’s administration tacitly executing OIC charter in appointments – Akinosun

By

bvichannel1

-

January 28, 2020

President of the Christ Apostolic Church (CAC) Worldwide, Pastor Abraham Akinosun, on Tuesday alleged that President Muhammadu Buhari’s administration is tacitly executing the agenda of the Organisation of Islamic Countries (OIC) in Nigeria with the key appointments he has made into his government so far.

He made the allegation when he spoke with journalists on the state of the nation ahead of a vigil organised in memory of the first president of the CAC and a colourful Olubadan of Ibadanland, Oba Isaac Akinyele, who breathed his last on May 30, 1964.

Akinosun noted that the late Oba Akinyele was the Balogun of Ibadanland and it was during his time that Ibadan got liberated from the hegemonic rule of the then Alaafin of Oyo, before being crowned as Olubadan.

According to him, “persecution in the olden days was from the orthodox churches, but the 1930 mighty revival of the CAC humbled the unbelievers to the extent that they submitted all they called gods. Even, the mighty masquerades of Ibadan and the herbalists forgot to celebrate their annual festival because of the influence of that revival.

“But these days, persecution is coming from the government, though not directly. Our governments are shielding the persecutors, and this should not be. Whenever any president is being sworn in, what they always read to them is the observance of the principle of justice; that he should not favour one religion to the detriment of another.

“At every one of our pastors’ conferences, we usually emphasise it in our addresses that the president should make the appointment of security officers of the country to be evenly distributed. They should not be all northerners and all Muslims.

“But now, everyone can see that it seems the government of this country is executing OIC (Organisation of Islamic Countries) charter. This is because, in any country that executes OIC agenda, all officers must be Muslims. And if you look at it now, nearly everyone of the security chiefs is a Muslim.

“All security officers, including the Police, Army, Air Force, and so on, are Muslims. It is the same with all other departments like Immigration, Customs and the rest. And when anything untoward happens, they will be commiserating with the families, and the community instead of seeing to it that all those evil things don’t happen in the first place.”

source :sun

SOWERE – Pleasing North Like Jonathan Wouldn’t Make Them Love You

By

bvichannel1

-

January 28, 2020

#NaWeBeGovernment #BVIChannel1

This is what Nigeria has turned Nigerian into….
Hunger and Poverty have turned Nigerians to Zombies.

Biafra Untold Story – How Ojukwu Saved Lives Of 200 Nigerian Soldiers

By

bvichannel1

-

January 27, 2020

Just don’t miss from 4:00 mins of this video
When I see this things, my respect and love for our fathers deepens.
Share your thought on comment section.

Tanko – Hope Uzodinma & Fr Mbaka Panics As Court Documents Leaks

By

bvichannel1

-

January 26, 2020

Listen and watch carefully as we expose the impunity and desperate attempt by Fulani controlled Supreme Court of Injustice led By Tanko Mohamed which the religious bigots tagged Prophesy by APC Spiritual spokesman Fr Mbaka.

SSANU UNIZIK Storms Anambra Govt House, Protests Abduction Of Member

By

bvichannel1

-

January 24, 2020

Raymond Ozoji, Awka

The Senior Staff Association of Nigerian Universities Nnamdi Azikiwe University branch Awka stormed the government house on Friday in protest against the kidnap of one of her members, Engr. Emeka Chiaghana.

Though a peaceful protest, the protesters carried placards with various inscriptions bordering on the whereabouts of their member, who was said to have been kidnapped at his Nibo residence in Awka-South local government area of the state on 25th October last year.

Chairperson of the association, Comrade Njideka Nwangwu, said the protest was necessitated by the abduction of her member Engr. Emeka Chiaghana by unknown persons.

She said, “Up till now we have not seen nor heard from him and his destination is neither known by his wife, family members and friends.

By this peaceful protest, SSANU UNIZIK enjoins the government of Anambra state, security agencies, the university community and the general public to note this important development.”

Nwangwu noted that though SSANU is aware of the efforts of security agencies and Unizik management in trying to ensure the release of her member alive, she said the relevant authorities should expedite action for him to regain his freedom and join his family.

Responding on behalf of the state government, the Secretary to the State Government, Prof. Solo Chukwulobelu, assured members of SSANU UNIZIK that security agencies were on top of the issue.

Prof. Chukwulobelu also stated that the state government has not gone to bed on the matter and has been conducting investigations underground to nail his abductors and reunite him with his immediate family.

Also, the SSG disclosed that the state government has been feeding the Vice Chancellor, Prof. Charles Esimone, with the latest information regarding Engr. Chiaghana’s kidnap. He said the latest update on the issue was given to Prof. Esimone on 7th January, 2020.

He therefore urged the protesting senior staff of Unizik not to despair but to be strong in their faith as the state government and other security agencies would ensure that their colleague is released from captivity.

It will be recalled that Engr. Emeka Chiaghana, a member of staff of the Management Information and Communication Technology Unit of Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka was abducted in his house at Nibo Awka-South on 25th October, 2019 and there have been no traces of him anywhere yet