Saturday, May 30, 2026
Home Blog Page 507

Moses, Ekong make African Player of the Year shortlist

Super Eagles’ duo of Victor Moses and William Troost-Ekong have been nominated alongside 28 others for the   2017 African Footballer of the Year Award .

Moses and Ekong who were instrumental to Nigeria’s qualification of the Russia 2018 FIFA World Cup were among the 30 players shortlisted for Africa’s top individual honor.

Moses, who had a fantastic season last year with Chelsea, helping the London club to the EPL trophy, is among the favourites for the award alongside Liverpool’s duo of Saido Mane and Mohamed Salah.

Another Nigerian, Junior Ajayi who plies his professional trade with Al Ahly of Egypt was among the 30 names selected for the African player of the year based in Africa.

Portuguese outfit Porto supplied the most players with Algerian Yacine Brahimi, Malian Moussa Marega and Cameroonian Vincent Aboubakar listed.

Surprise 2017 Africa Cup of Nations winners Cameroon have three hopefuls – Aboubakar, Sevilla goalkeeper Fabrice Ondoa and China-based winger Christian Bassogog on the list.

Reigning African Player of the year, Riyad Mahrez of Algeria is conspicuously missing in the 30-man list released by the Confederation of African Football (CAF) yesterday.

Nigerian energy giants, AITEO, are the headline sponsors of next year’s edition that will see players, officials and administrators who distinguished themselves during the year under review being honoured.

The winner will be decided by votes from the Head Coaches/Technical Directors of the National Associations affiliated to CAF, members of the CAF Technical and Development Committee and a panel of Media Experts.

The Awards Gala would be held on Thursday, 4 January 2018 in Accra, Ghana.

Source: The Sun

IPOB is indigenous people-Barr Emeka replies Buhari

EMEKA EMEKESRI, SOLICITOR FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLE OF BIAFRA, REPLIES PRESIDENT MUHAMMADU BUHARI

ON HIS STATEMENT AGAINST BIAFRA INDEPENDENCE STRUGGLE.

 

Your Excellency, President Muhammadu Buhari, for some days now, I did not consider it necessary to respond to a statement credited to you in the Sun Newspaper of 10 May 2016 where you were reported to have said that instead of allowing the Biafrans to go, it would be better for all the Nigerians to be drowned in the sea. I did not want to respond to you because I had thought that the Attorney-General of the Federation and all your lawyers defending Nigeria in the on-going case between Biafra and Nigeria at the Federal High Court Owerri in Suit No FHC/OW/CS/192/2013 would advise you to be careful in making some utterances which I believe, with due respect, to be careless statements from the President of a country. I am making this response because your statement is contemptuous of the proceedings in court and likely to prejudice my clients’ case. Let me reproduce the statements from the Sun Newspaper:

 

“President Muhammadu Buhari vowed, yesterday, in his home state of Katsina, to use all resources at his disposal to crush any agitation for the division of Nigeria. The president said the country fought a civil war which claimed over two million lives in order to be united. Buhari, who spoke at the palace of Emir of Katsina also urged Nigerians to be patient with his government as, according to him, the current hardship being experienced, may not be unconnected with efforts at laying a solid foundation for sustainable nation building. Buhari was in Katsina to attend the state’s economic and investment forum which he will officially declare open this morning. In a veiled reference to the current separatist agitation for Biafra being promoted by a group, the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Buhari warned it would be better for the entire country to commit mass suicide than to allow such campaign to succeed. He referred to the promoters of the agitation as “kids” who were not born during the civil war. According to Buhari, “today, Nigeria is a strong and united sovereign entity because some people laid down their lives for the country. At least two million people died during the civil war but, today, some people who were not born during the civil war are agitating for the division of the country. We will not let that happen. “For Nigeria to divide now, it is better for all of us to jump into the sea and get drowned.”

 

Mr President, with due respect, it appears that you have not informed Nigerians that the country is sitting on a keg of gunpowder from the legal arsenals of the Biafran lawyers battling with the Nigerian lawyers in the Federal High Court Owerri since 2012 on the issue of Self-determination of the Biafran nation. The Federal Republic of Nigeria and the Attorney-General of the Federation are the Defendants in the suit. The Defendants have changed their lawyers several times because the case is too hot for them. This is the case that terrifies the Nigerian Government as they know that it may end up in the International Court of Justice at The Hague where Cameroon defeated Nigeria and took away the Bakassi region.

 

The doctrine of indivisibility of Nigeria is not sacrosanct as the Bakassi region has been separated from Nigeria by judicial power! Why did the Nigerian Government not argue in the ICJ that the Nigerian Constitution said that no part of Nigeria could be removed from Nigeria? Of course, you ought to know the power of law. By law nations are created and by law nations are restructured or dissolved. It is not a child’s play. Mr President, you may assemble more lawyers to defend Nigeria in this case but I assure you that my clients will surely win the legal battle because it may not end in the Nigerian courts. We are preparing for The Hague.

 

The Nigerian Government knows that the ongoing suit between Biafra and Nigeria was authorised by the Supreme Council of Elders of Indigenous People of Biafra, some of whose members are older than Mr President Muhammadu Buhari and senior to him in the Army. The Nigerian Government and the hierarchy of the DSS Police know the leaders of Indigenous People of Biafra because at the commencement of the suit in 2012, we duly served all the Nigerian Authorities with the Legal Notices including the documents from the Court showing the Elders of Biafraland who are the leaders of Indigenous People of Biafra.

 

I am surprised at your statement to the Press that the promoters of the Biafran agitation for self-determination were “kids” who were not born during the war! Mr President, you have insulted the Elders of my clients who signed the Legal Instrument in the Federal High Court authorising Bilie Human Rights Initiative to file the action on behalf of Indigenous People of Biafra against the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the Attorney-General of the Federation. Our Elders require an apology from you for referring to them as “kids” promoting the Biafran agitation. Just as we respect you as the President of Nigeria, we also expect you to respect our Elders who are the custodians of the Customary Government of Indigenous People of Biafra.

 

The Biafran Liberation Struggle is not under the control of the Biafra Elders being led by the Supreme Council of Elders of Indigenous People of Biafra who have adopted the legal and diplomatic method of self-determination. ,

Mr President, your statement that instead of allowing Nigeria to divide it would be better for all Nigerians to drown in the sea and commit mass suicide is very serious with very serious legal and social implications. You are directly or indirectly telling the Judge to dismiss the case of my clients so that Biafra cannot be free from Nigeria. I believe that you were not joking when you made that statement. You really meant it. You wouldn’t mind drowning all the Nigerians in the sea instead of allowing the Biafrans to go.

 

However, I think, with due respect, that you made that statement in ignorance of what the Nigerian law says about the peoples’ inalienable right to self-determination. I do not blame you because you are not a lawyer by training. You are a soldier turned into a politician. I rather blame your lawyers who should have advised you before you made those provocative statements.

 

Nevertheless, I want to allay your fears about the break-up of Nigeria. We have no intention to destroy Nigeria. We respect Nigeria and the Nigerian Government. Our intention is to set Biafra free from Nigeria by the rule of law and not to destroy Nigeria just as Eritrea was set free from Ethiopia without destroying Ethiopia; just as South Sudan was set free from Sudan without destroying Sudan; just as Bangladesh and Pakistan were set free from India without destroying India. Mr President, it must not be by war. I do not really blame you and other people who think in error that self-determination must always be achieved through war and violence. There are three methods of achieving independence, namely: the military method, the political method and the judicial method. Scotland is using the political process of referendum because the British law has not provided for the right of self-determination as a legal right by an Act of Parliament but the Biafrans are using the judicial process because the Nigerian law has provided for the right of self-determination by an Act of Parliament.

 

Under the Nigerian law, the right to self-determination was created as a legal right by an Act of the National Assembly unlike in Britain. I do not want to bother you with the issues of law here. Whether by political process or judicial process, the exercise of the right to self-determination must not always be through war. Mr President, the next court hearing is on the 2nd June 2016 at the Federal High Court Owerri and we are expecting you and your lawyers in Court.

 

Your Excellency, my clients want to go and rebuild their own nation of Biafra so that the owners of Nigeria will enjoy their country very well without further disturbances from the Biafrans. Mr President, please mark my word: “As long as you hold my clients in Nigeria against their will, there will be no peace for Nigeria. I assert firmly that Biafra shall be free either within Nigeria or outside Nigeria and nobody shall be drowned in the sea as you have threatened”. My clients are yearning for freedom and they must be free. It is either freedom within Nigeria or freedom outside Nigeria. Please refer to the 8 issues for determination in Court and the 8 prayers we have made in Court. I assert with authority on this question of self-determination that Justice shall prevail in the end and the heavens shall not fall. Lest I forget: I have heard a rumour that when somebody makes a constructive criticism against your views, or holds an opinion contrary to yours, you would unleash the DSS policemen against the person like attack dogs. Is it true, Mr President? Please, I advise you to be properly guided with wisdom and understanding in your utterances and actions.

 

Emeka Emekesri, Esq.
Solicitor for Indigenous People of Biafra
Suit No FHC/OW/CS/192/2013
Federal High Court Owerri

 

Biafra: OurMumuDonDo movement condemns invasion of Nnamdi Kanu’s house

The OurMumuDonDo Movement, convened by Charly boy, otherwise known as ‘’the area father’’ has condemned the detachment of soldiers to the home of IPOB leader, Nnamdi Kanu.

In a statement released by the OurMumuDonDo team, it has said the federal government should be more concerned on safeguarding lives and properties instead of destroying it.

The statement was signed by Charles Oputa, Convener OurMumuDonDo Movement, Adeyanju Deji, Convener, Concerned Nigerians, and Adebayo Raphael, Publicity Secretary OurMumuDonDo Movement.

The movement also said the people of Abia State deserved better than the undue panic in the city.

‘’The good people of Abia State deserve better than the undue panic under which they have been placed since the invasion which has completely restricted them from going about their daily activities freely like they used to,’’‎ he said.

Reacting to the destruction of laptops and other valuables at the NUJ Aba Road, it said ”as much as we are aware that the Federal Government is concerned about curbing divisive messages and inordinate agitations within the country.”

The movement however urged the Federal Government to be committed in dousing tension and promoting peace and unity rather than steam up flames of enmity in the country, saying it should be more concerned on safeguarding the lives and properties of all Nigerians in any part of the country.

‘’It is also important to note that though recanted, the October 1ultimatum issued by some misguided northern youths to the Igbos in the north remains weighty in the minds of many and the atmosphere is hypersensitive to any mishap that could foment such interethnic melee.

‘’Finally, we appeal to the Federal Government to be more circumspect and solution-focused in handling sensitive matters as secessionist agitations within the country,’’ it added

Source :Daily post

N88bn compensation to victims of Biafra war: Anambra, Rivers, Akwa Ibom, Delta, Ebonyi, Cross River, Abia, Enugu, Benue to benefit

…Opts for out-of-court settlement of case before ECOWAS Court

Determined to quell rising agitation by secessionist groups, the Federal Government, yesterday, agreed to release N88 billion for the compensation of victims of the Nigeria/Biafra civil war, as well as for completion of demining and destruction of abandoned explosives within the South-East, South-South and North Central regions of the country. Federal Government, in terms of agreement it endorsed before the ECOWAS Court in Abuja yesterday, said while it would pay N50 billion compensation to “true victims” of the civil war that occured between 1967 and 1970,  a total sum of N38 billion will be paid to contractors for total and complete demining and destruction of abandoned bombs and landmines within the regions.

The decision followed a suit marked ECW/CCJ/APP/06/12, which was filed before the ECOWAS Court on May 2, 2012, by one Vincent Agu and 19 others against FG and five others. Federal Government opted for an out-of-court settlement of the matter after four years negotiation period. According to the agreement document which the ECOWAS court adopted as its consent judgment, two firms, RSB Holdings Nigeria Limited and Deminers Concept Nigeria Limited, were said to have been contracted in 2009 to carry out demining exercise in the war affected areas. Federal Government told the court that after an exercise that was conducted by medical experts that were employed by the two contractors to screen and identify true victims of the war, “All the parties to this suit acknowledge that 685 persons were selected and classified as survivors while 493 of them were confirmed as victims of either landmines or other dangerous military ordinance including locally fabricated weapons, hence entitled to compensation including their families and communities. “Whereas the parties also acknowledged that a total of over 17, 000 bombs were recovered and destroyed by the 4th and 5th Respondents (the contractors), while a total of 1, 317 are still in the stockpile located at the Mine Action Center, Owerri, Imo State, a large quantity of live bombs still litter the Applicant’s communities.” States listed to benefit  from the deal are Anambra, Rivers, Imo, Akwa Ibom, Delta, Ebonyi, Cross River, Abia, Enugu and Benue. The plaintiffs had in the suit they filed for themselves and as representatives of victims of the Nigerian civil war, including all the 493 victims pre-enumerated by the Ministry of Defence, demanded N100m as compensatory and general damages.

According to the terms of agreement sighted by our Reporter, while the N50bn compensation would be paid into United Bank for Africa, UBA, account No. 1018230076 which was nominated by counsel to the victims, Chief Noel Agwuocha Chukwukadibia & Co, the other N38bn woud be paid into Deminers Concept Nig. Ltd UBA account No. 1016296801, belonging to the contractors. Federal Government however maintained that the Terms of Settlement  shall operate as full and final  settlement of all claims arising from alleged violation of rights of victims of the Biafran war “in any other suits, action or matter however so called that may arise from this subject matter.” The Government said it agreed to release the funds, being conscious of unexploded bombs and other remnants of war that littered some parts of the South-East, South-South and North Central regions and the inherent dangers posed thereof. It said that it reviewed and took “full cognizance of the dire situation and unmitigated threat posed to the Applicants and their communities by aging bombs and other post war lethal materials left under the elements in public places like schools, churches, courts, farmlands and market places”, adding that it was agreed that the contractors, “having satisfactorily performed the 1st phase of the project be mobilised back to site to complete the final phase of the ongoing demining process.” Part of the 11 points resolution the ECOWAS court adopted as its judgment  on Monday  included: “That a Special Purpose Vehicle, SPV, comprising of all the necessary stakeholders shall be created for the implementation of the activities to ensure transparency and accountability. “That the Federal Republic of Nigeria undertakes to set up in the South-East, the National Mine Action Center in Owerri Imo State of Nigeria. “That every landmine, unexploded ordinance and explosive remnants of war discovered in the course of the jobs should be completely detroyed. “That the Federal Republic of Nigeria undertakes to rebiuld and or rehabilitate all public/private buildings already identified in the enumerated exercise by the war or used either as military facility or refugee camp during the war as contained in schedule 2 of this Terms of Settlement. “That the Federal Republic of Nigeria undertakes to construct one block of ten (10) classrooms for 50 communities presently barred from using their school facilities because of the presence of bombs and other post war relics; construction of court houses, churches and worship centers where explosive ordnance were found by the 4th and 5th Respondents. “That parties herein urge the honourable court to adopt as the consent judgment this Terms of Settlement in full and final settlement of this case. “That the Federal Republic of Nigeria shall implement the judgment order(s) of this honourable court to wit, payment of the agreed sum as contained in paragraph 16 and 18 above, within a reasonable time not exceeding 45 days from the day of this judgment”. Falana, Egbeyinka, signed on FG’s behalf Lagos-based human rights activist, Chief Femi Falana, SAN, and Mr. Shola Egbeyinka, signed the agreement on behalf of the federal government and it was documented as consent judgement by head of the ECOWAS Court panel, Justice Chijioke Nwoke.

It’s an interim stop-gap to placate Ndigbo – Ebonyi Igbo leader Reacting to the development, an  Igbo leader in Ebonyi State, Chief Abia Onyike yesterday described the move by President Muhammadu Buhari to pay N88 billion to the victims of Biafra  as an interim stop-gap to placate Ndigbo in the country. He said:”I welcome the gesture as an interim stop-gap measure to placate Ndigbo.   It will go a long way to assuage the painful horrors of the Igbo genocide. “However, nothing can replace the self-determination or independence of the Igbo nation as a distinct and autonomous mega ethnic nationality in Africa. Buhari has worked hard to extinguish Biafra and he will fail, the same way  Gowon and Murtala Muhammed failed.” Gowon responsible for Nigeria woes since 1967 — Biafra Zionists In another development, proactive pro-Biafra group, the Biafra Zionist Federation, BZF, has lashed out on ex-military dictator and former Head of state, Gen. Yakubu Gowon (rtd), calling him a coward and accusing him of lying. Gowon had recently granted an interview to a national newspaper  where he accused late Biafra leader, Dim Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu of thwarting the 1967 Aburi accord which brought about the 3 years civil war.

But the BZF, yesterday, described Gowon’s statements as lies and  an  act of cowardice to have waited for 8 years after Ojukwu’s demise to make such preposterous claims. The group wondered why Gowon did not come out to speak when Ojukwu was alive and why he suddenly fell ill after returning from Aburi, Ghana, as he claimed in the interview. Leader of BZF, Mr. Onwuka Nsiegbe in a statement he released in Enugu, yesterday said it  was shameful for Gowon to engage in such a “high calibre twisting of history even at his old age.” While chiding Gowon for going to Aburi unprepared, Onwuka said, “he is a coward and a British stooge. “Why is he coming now to tell us what happened during the civil war; why didn’t he make these declarations when Ojukwu was alive; why did he wait until 8 years of Ojukwu’s demise  to say Ojukwu lied; why now?” He challenged Gowon to produce what he claimed to be the true Aburi Accord for the world to see if he was sincere that Ojukwu gave the accord a different interpretation.

Onwuka said, “Gowon is to be blamed for the crisis in Nigeria from 1967 till date; he caused the whole crisis. He could not control the killing of the Easterners as the then head of State.   The Aburi Accord would have sorted out all  Nigeria’s problems. “The Biafrans came up with a model; a Swiss confederation model; the East, led by Ojukwu went prepared; Gowon went there empty; he came up with nothing. “Now, having agreed and signed the accord,  it was expected that Gowon would come back and make an announcement but he refused to make the announcement; what happened? “The British government reached out to him and warned him not to implement the Aburi Accord; he was never sick. He was afraid that the Igbos would control the oil. “There was pressure on Ojukwu to tell the people what was agreed in Aburi. Gowon reneged on the Aburi Accord on the advice of British government. “If he were sick, what of his vice, what of his foreign minister, what of his information minister? So, he deliberately went incommunicado. That was the genesis of the crisis.” Onwuka added that “in further defiance to the Aburi Accord, this same Gowon created 12 states; the British government advised him to create 12 states instead of implementing the Aburi Accord. The East rejected it and that was the beginning of the full-blown crisis. “Ojukwu never envisaged secession; the Eastern region never envisaged secession; it was Gowon’s refusal to implement  the Aburi Accord and his subsequent creation of 12 states that caused all these problems which are still lingering till date. “Ojukwu’s only mistake was not accepting the offer from Russia. It was a diplomatic blunder; a diplomatic deficiency; failure to understand international politics. “Gowon  is  the cause of the civil war; he is the cause of all the problems facing Nigeria today. He brought this up now in order to weaken Biafra agitation; he is doing this to destabilize what we are doing about Biafra’s independence.” without knowing that he succeeded then because of international support from the United Kingdom. Biafra had none.” “Ojukwu’s only mistake was not accepting offer from Russia. It was a diplomatic blunder; a diplomatic deficiency; failure to understand international politics. That is why we are saying that only the United States can help us get Biafra. “He is already paying for his sins. Look at herdsmen massacring his people in Kogi, Nasarawa, Benue, Taraba, Kwara and the rest. These are the people he used to fight the Igbos. It same on both Danjuma and Gowon.”

N88bn compensation to victims of Biafra war: Anambra, Rivers, Akwa Ibom, Delta, Ebonyi, Cross River, Abia, Enugu and Benue to benefit

SOURCE: VANGUARD

Shadow of Nigeria’s Biafra war still looms large, 50 years on

On May 30, 1967, General Emeka Ojukwu declared Nigeria’s southeastern Biafra region an independent state, sparking what would become a bloody civil war that claimed more than one million lives. Fifty years on, many veterans from both sides of the conflict have taken their stories to the grave, but FRANCE 24 managed to meet with some who shared their memories of bravery, desertion and near-death experiences.

The first shots of the Biafra war were exchanged in Obudu, a provincial town in southeast Nigeria. Today, Obudu is a sleepy tropical backwater that harbours few signs of a brutal civil war. But in most families, there is someone who remembers how the war divided the town, which back then straddled the border between Nigeria and Biafra.

At the beginning of the conflict, the people of Obudu supported the Biafrans out of geographical convenience. But by the end of the war, after seeing upwards of a million civilians die of starvation, many young men from the town deserted the Biafran army to become informers for the Nigerian military, helping them to ultimately win the war.

The interests of foreign powers played out during the war, with Britain arming the Nigerians. The French and Russians sold guns and ammunition to the Biafrans, while the Swedish aristocrat and aviator Carl Gustaf von Rosen helped establish the Biafran Air Force. Tanks and unexploded ordnance still litter the countryside of southeastern Nigeria. Over 300 people have been killed by landmines since the guns fell silent 50 years ago.

The Biafrans manufactured landmines, rockets and hand grenades, contributing to one of the most sophisticated indigenous weapons programmes in Africa’s history. But instead of harnessing that ingenuity for industrial development like Germany and Japan did, the Nigerian authorities let that knowledge go to waste.

Above all, Biafra will be remembered not for the Biafrans’ military ingenuity nor for the Nigerians’ military might — but for the humanitarian fallout. Millions of people around the world watched the horrors of enforced starvation play out on their television screens. These were the first images of malnourished African children that people had ever seen. The notion of international humanitarian aid as we now know it was born out of the deaths of one million Biafrans.

Source: France 24

S-East govs responsible for invasion of Kanu’s house —IPOB

 

Nnewi—The Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, yesterday, said it is holding five South-East state governments, particularly, Abia State and Ohanaeze Ndigbo responsible for the siege and invasion of its leader and Director of Radio Biafra, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu family house in Afaraukwu, Umuahia, Abia State.

IPOB in a statement by its Media and Publicity Secretary, Comrade Emma Powerful, alleged that “Abia State Government in collaboration with other South-East State governments and Ohanaeze Ndigbo designed, perfected and unleashed Operation Python Dance on the people and the accompanying killing spree ostensibly to eliminate our leader, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, since he cannot be bought or compromised. Leader of Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu “We, the IPOB, under the command and leadership of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu are holding the Government of Abia State, four other South-East state governments and Ohanaeze Ndigbo responsible for the siege and invasion of our leader’s compound in Afaraukwu Ibeku, Umuahia from September  10  to 14, 2017. “The repeated denials of Governopr Okezie Ikpeazu and his hired hands will not eradicate the fact that, he, along with other South East governors designed and perfected Operation Python Dance and the accompanying killing spree ostensibly to eliminate our leader. “The Abia State government led by Dr Okezie Ikpeazu should, therefore, stop deceiving Nigerians on his real motive for imposing the curfew that followed the attack on Mazi Kanu’s home. He should rather toe the part of sanity by accepting responsibility of his well thought out action with his co- conspirators and give a true account of their action, before the people of Biafra. “He should also explain how they managed to allow envy and jealousy over the popularity of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu to overwhelm them to the point of conniving with the Nigerian Army in killing defenseless unarmed Biafra agitators fighting for the liberation of their people. “The Abia State governor’s claim that he imposed a curfew during the invasion of our leader’s house in Umuahia to save 11 million Igbo in the North is laughable.

That was a fabricated lie to deceive the people and with the intention to deflecting rising anger against him by Biafrans in Nigeria and in the Diaspora.” “The only reason Dr Okezie Ikpeazu imposed a curfew in Abia State was to stop IPOB members from mobilising to defend our leader,  Kanu, during the invasion of his home by the soldiers. that he personally invited into Abia State. If it was the interest of securing the lives of Igbo in Hausa territories as they claim, they would not have escalated tension in the country by actively asking the Nigerian Army to come and kill the arrow-head of IPOB.” “What South East Governors and the Ohaneze Ndigbo leadership did not factor into their calculation was that IPOB is a global movement with a unique structure that no man can destroy, the architects of that attack were dreamers for thinking their well crafted lies which they have been selling to media houses can save them from the impending doom.

source :Vanguard

Breaking: Ex-Nigerian Vice President Alex Ekwueme in coma

The former Vice President of Nigeria, Dr. Alex Ekwueme has reportedly slumped and in coma. The second republic Vice-President was reported to have collapsed early morning of Saturday 29th of October, 2017 at his residence at Independence Layout in Enugu.

Report from his family members said Dr. Ekwueme is currently at the Intensive Care Unit of Memfys Hospital located along Penok petrol station in Trans-Ekulu, Enugu State for Neurosurgery.

“He was trying to get something from the table when he suddenly collapsed and immediately someone raised the alarm, we proceeded to revive him while cautious enough not to attract neighbours,” a relative, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said. “When it became obvious that he had lapsed into coma, we rushed him to a hospital (unnamed) in GRA (Government Reserved Area), but we were referred to Memphys Hospital by medical consultants who had critically examined his condition.” “When there was no sign of improvement on Monday afternoon, we rallied round and informed the former governor of Anambra State, Mr. Peter Obi, who is like a son, and he has been making plans to fly him overseas.”

Source: vanguard

Court dismisses Diezani’s application for trial in Nigeria

The Federal High Court in Lagos on Wednesday rejected an application by a former Minister of Petroleum Resources, Mrs. Diezani Alison-Madueke, seeking to be joined as a defendant in an alleged N450m fraud case in Nigeria.

Justice Rilwan Aikawa, while rejecting the application, described it as bizarre and a misuse of court processes, stressing that he would not allow himself to be used to frustrate Diezani’s imminent trial in the United Kingdom, where is currently under investigation and on bail.

The judge declined all of Diezani’s prayers, including an order mandating the Attorney General of the Federation to facilitate her return from the UK, where is currently being investigated for alleged fraud by the Metropolitan Police.

Source: Punch

Breaking: I don’t have N1bn to give Jonathan, Metuh tells court

 

Embattled former National Publicity Secretary of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, Chief Olisa Metuh, has asked the Federal High Court in Abuja not to set aside the subpoena it issued to compel former President Goodluck Jonathan to appear as a witness in his ongoing trial.

Jonathan and Metuh Metuh further challenged Jonathan’s insistence that the defendant must deposit with the court, for and on behalf of himself, the sum of N1billion in line with provisions of Section 241(2) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015, before he would mount the witness box. Jonathan had in a motion his lawyer, Chief Mike Ozekhome, SAN, moved before the court on Wednesday, urged trial Justice Okon Abang to compel Metuh to pay the N1bn to cover travelling expenses for himself and his security personnel from his home town, Otuoke in Bayelsa State, to Abuja and also for time that he might spend appearing before the court as President of Nigeria between 2010 to 2015. Jonathan maintained that the evidence Metuh is seeking from him would amount to an invasion of his personal right to privacy, and family life as provided for in Section 37 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999. He told the court that the evidence sought to be obtained from him was likely to expose him to a criminal charge, penalty or forfeiture. The former President further argued that the subpoena ad testifiandum Justice Abang issued against him on October 23 was vague, applied for and obtained on frivolous ground and in bad faith, saying it was meant to embarrass him as a person. Besides, Jonathan argued that Metuh was not a personal aid or his appointee and therefore could not have dealt with the President directly under any circumstance to warrant the invitation of the applicant to testify in the charge. He said there was no nexus between hiim and Metuh and the charge for which the defendants are standing trial. However, the ex-President said he was not doubtful of the fact that there was a contractual agreement between Metuh and the former National Security Adviser, Col. Sambo Dasuki, retd. Ozehkome said: “The linchpin of this application is not that the former President is throwing doubts on transactions involving the defendants and Dasuki, but that he was not physically present when the transactions were going on, because he had many appointees. “My lord, because of this, we are saying that he will not be a good witness to state what actually happened regarding the transactions. “He can never be able to know details of transactions all his aides carried out within his over four years tenure in office. He is not saying that the transactions are fake or incorrect or fictitious, no! He is only saying that he does not know the details. “Whatever evidence he will be giving based on the subpoena will amount to hearsay evidence”. Neverthless, in a five-paragraphed counter- affidavit that was moved by his lawyer, Mr. Emeka Etiaba, SAN, Metuh said he does not have N1bn to give Jonathan who he said had in his own motion admitted that he (Metuh) served the nation well. Etiaba drew attention of the court to the fact that the bailiff earlier deposed an affidavit that he had yet to serve the subpoena on Jonathan. “This application is therefore not only soeculative but premature and deserves to be struck out. “With respect to demand for deposition of N1bn, the 1st defendant in his affidavit averred that he does not have such amount. “We believe that such demand is punitive and meant to frustate the 1st defendant’s attempt at obtaining an evidence that will assist him in the defence of the charge against him before this court. “It is the view of the 1st defendant that from the first day that he was arrested, he made it clear that the release of the money was authorised by the former President and was released by the former NSA, Dasuki. “My lord this application simply seeks to set aside the subpoena and to save this nation the embarrasment of having a man who means a lot to the entire country as a former President, to step into the dock to give evidence. “My lord it is unprecedented, and the embarrassment could have been aborted if the charge against the 1st defendant was not preferred after he had disclosed to the EFCC the source of the fund for which the defendants are standing trial. “My lord in the circumstance, it is our position that this application be struck out”, Etiaba added.

On its part, the EFCC, through its lawyer, Mr. Sylvanus Tahir, told the court that it would remain indifferent to Jonathan’s application. Meantime, the court is still entertaining arguments from all the parties, including Dasuki who is asking Justice Abang to hands-off the trial for the Court of Appeal to decide the merit of appeal he lodged to void subpoena issued to also compel him to testify in the matter. It will be recalled that Justice Abang had on October 25, handed the bailiff five days to serve the subpoena on Jonathan to enable him to appear as a witness in Metuh’s trial. EFCC had in the seven-count charge it preferred against Metuh and his firm, Destra Investment Ltd, alleged that the defendants had before the 2015 presidential election, received N400million from the Office of the National Security Adviser, ONSA, without executing any contract. It said the fund which was released to Metuh and his firm by the erstwhile NSA, Col. Sambo Dasuki, retd,‎ ‎was part of about $2.1billion earmarked for the purchase of arms to fight insurgency in the North East. He was equally accused of money laundering. EFCC alleged that Metuh engaged in an illicit transaction that involved $2m
.

source : Vanguard

Anambra guber: Obi, Obiano should stop washing dirty linen in public – Okeke

A former Chairman of Police Service Commission, Chief Simon Okeke, has told former Governor Peter Obi of Anambra State and his successor, Willie Obiano, to settle their differences out of public domain instead of ‘washing their dirty linen in the public’.

Chief Okeke reasoned that since former Governor Obi claimed that Governor Obiano owed him N7 billion, nothing stopped him from deducting the amount from the N75 billion he claimed that he handed over to Governor Obiano.

He condemned the ‘embarrassment’ generated by their claims and counter claims. He said he wondered whether former Governor Obi wanted to be the godfather of Anambra politics.

The former police boss said at the age of 80, he has no more interest in partisan politics but would only offer advice as an elder statesman.

In his words, “Having hit 80 and sound in health, I will only advise. I remember that before Obiano was made the Governor of Anambra State, Obi called me as the Igbo leader in Abuja and Chairman of Anambra State Public Officers and Elders Forum and told me that he would introduce to me who would be the next Governor of Anambra State.

“I rallied the Anambra people at Chelsea Hotel, Abuja and the entire executive members of the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) led by himself, Chief Victor Umeh, Tim Menakaya, Uche Ekwunife and many others gathered. It was there that Obi raised the hand of Obiano and declared him tested and trusted person to take over from him. He appealed for support for Obiano. On that ground I called all Anambra people living in Abuja to go home enmass and vote accordingly. I told them that Obi had done well and the man he presented to us as tested and trusted should be voted for. Even though I was a Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) member then, ours is ours,” Chief Okeke said.

He noted that it was shocking that within one month or so of Obiano’s take over there came up stories of discord between him and Mr Obi.

“Here is a man he said is tested and trusted. If indeed he is asking Obiano to pay him N7 billion because Obiano is now untested and untrusted and Obiano could not then there is a big question mark on the ex-Governor. I do not know whether Obi really demanded that or not because I was not there. I expect that Obi would have called us again to tell us that he no longer trusted this man. If Obiano has committed an offence against the State, I will be the first person to cast my vote against him. But as at today, I have not heard that Obiano committed a fraud to the magnitude to be voted out.

Okeke was of the view that if Obi had reached an agreement with Obiano to lend him N7 billion for an election signed and sealed, that it would have been a different thing. He said Obiano would have to pay that but not from Anambra purse. He told the duo to settle the matter outside the people’s view.

He noted that Governor Obiano had performed excellently to deserve a second tenure. He mentioned security as a major breakthrough of Obiano’s administration.

He also said it would be rational, cost effective and would lesson tension to allow Governor Obiano to complete his two tenures instead of dissipating energy to shop for replacement.

Source: The Sun