Intersociety is calling for convocation of the Third Vatican Council to address a myriad of challenges facing the Mother Church and other churches as well as immediate “exportation” of Rev Father Mbaka to Vatican for “pastoral, classroom study and sanctification leave”.
For purpose of saving the image of the Mother Church and the people of good conscience, Father Mbaka is in dire of “pastoral, study and sanctification classroom leave”. He is also in dire need of fresh ideas including post priesthood bachelor’s degree or post graduate studies and qualifications. He must be transformed from “trader-priest” to “priest of scholarship and eminently spiritual background” and not allowed to return to Nigeria until he completes a doctorate degree in any chosen or assigned discipline.
Father Mbaka had in the course of his pastoral or pulpit sermons, probated and reprobated with reckless abandon; relying on unverifiable, unscientific, unsubstantiated and uninvestigated information from his followers; most of whom “persons living with limited education”. A clear case in point was the “Ohakim episode” in Imo State, which later turned out to be false, leading to belated open apology to the injured. There is also the “Jonathan episode” of 2015 and now “exposed Atiku episode programmed for 31st December 2018”.
The Third Vatican Council or Conference is, therefore, direly and urgently needed at The Holy See by the Mother Churchto address a myriad of challenges facing the global Catholic Church and its worldwide population of 1.285b (2015). The Third Vatican Council is also necessary so as to tackle similar challenges facing the entire Christians worldwide with estimated population of 2.2b (2010).
This is more so when the Catholic Church remains the “Mother Church” and global leader of the followers of Jesus Christ and his teachings. Any moral decadence affecting or afflicting the Church automatically affects or afflicts the entire Christians worldwide. One of these teething challenges is the excesses of some ordained Catholic priests which must be curbed before it becomes too late and intractable.
Immoralities including crude materialism, obsessive commercialism, misinterpretation and distortion of the gospel, among others became more menacing in the House of God following “the failure of the second mortal or immortal coming of Jesus Christ or end of the world biblical revelation projected to take place in the year 2000”.
As a result, immoralities have since then gone wild and become uncontrollable. And instead of the clergies and other leaders of the Christian faith taming the monsters righteously, they have relapsed; resorting to biblical loopholes to justify them as “normal and appropriate”. Following these, “road to righteousness, holiness and heaven” has become threatened or undermined; with priests, pastors and other clergies “beginning to build their paradises on earth” and churches getting brutally misled, misdirected and bastardized with reckless abandon.
It must be stated that the grave mistake made by leaders of the global Christian Faith especially the Papacy or The Holy See was failure to convoke “Third Vatican Council or Conference which ought to have been called not only to reaffirm faith and belief in God and the teachings of Jesus Christ, but also to address teething challenges facing the Mother Church and other churches since “the failed second mortal or immortal coming of Jesus Christ and end time in the year 2000”.
We therefore make bold to say that the recent “Mbaka episode” in Enugu was not an isolated incident, but a clear case of intensification and escalation of litany of immoralities running riot on the congregation of nowadays Christian priests and pastors who have turned the House of God into “gambling and cash and carry arenas”. These “mercantilist games played in the House of God” bear similar outlook with games played by politicians, called “the psychology of politics” or political trading and gambling.
It is on record that one of the greatest challenges facing the Mother Church or Catholic Church particularly in Africa and Nigeria is introduction of “priestly ministries” or “adoration ministries”. Patterns and trends associated with “Catholic priestly ministry” particularly in present Nigeria clearly indicate that it is nothing short of “trading and gambling using the name of God”.
For every “priestly ministry” set up, it is 95% for prosperity or materialism and 5% or less for salvation or righteousness. Banking on teeming “miracle seekers” in their tens or hundreds of thousands per ministry as well as the country’s myriad of socio-economic challenges, such congregants are rapaciously brainwashed with bogus promises of solutions to their “problems”; using same to swindle or rip them.
Politicians including candidates of political parties troop to such “adoration or crusade grounds” during electioneering for purpose of meeting large crowd gathered; without pausing to ask or determine whether they have PVCs or not. “Muoka Crusade” is one of such arenas attracting hundreds of thousands or millions of people, yet many, if not most do not have voters’ cards or vote on Election Day.
Therefore, it is specifically important to note that most of these “priestly ministries” or “adoration grounds” do not have electoral or voting value as most of those patronizing or attending such “adoration ministries or crusades” do not have permanent voters’ cards. Few that obtained theirs did same not for the purpose of voting during elections but to escape possible government sanction or to use them in transacting businesses. We have severally advised strongly against political candidates attending and campaigning on “adoration or crusade grounds”.
Records have also shown that once politicians are invited to donate their largely ill-gotten wealth and have same done, case closed. This is more so when the proprietors of such ministries hardly encourage or mobilize their followers to perform their civic duties on Election Day by conscientiously voting candidates of their choice and outside inducement.
Where they rarely do, it is for material gains on the part of the proprietors of such “adoration ground” or “crusade ministries”. Donation and acceptance of ill-gotten wealth as the motive behind invitation of politicians to visit “adoration ministries/grounds” or “crusades” has also robbed such arrangements of parameters and opportunities for the best candidates to be “spiritually screened”, invited and drilled by Christian leaders over their “social contract” with the people if voted into office.
Totality of these and more explains our call for convocation of the Third Vatican Council so as to review, expand, upgrade and fortify the Catholic Dogma and ethical codes guiding the conducts of the Church clergy. In the Catholic Church, a dogma is a definitive article of faith (de fide) that has been solemnly promulgated by the college of bishops at an ecumenical council or by the pope when speaking in a statement ex cathedra, in which the magisterium of the Church presents a particular doctrine as necessary for the belief of all Catholic faithful.
Convocation of the Third Vatican Council or Conference has, therefore, become compelling and inevitable to address the myriad of challenges facing the Mother Church and the entire global Christian population since “failure of Jesus Christ to mortally return for second missionary journey in the year 2000”.
These teething challenges ravaging the Christian world today include rabid commercialization of the gospel or teachings of Jesus Christ and brutal distortion of same for material primitivism. Combined negative effects of these have disenchanted tens of millions of Catholic and other Christian faithful in Nigeria and Africa and undermined their faith in God. They have further destroyed moral values and uprightness in the Mother Church and other churches and elevated moral decadence to maddening levels or dimensions.
The teething challenges ravaging the Mother Church capable of being tackled by the Third Vatican Council under demand include misinterpretation and distortion of the gospel, materialism in the Church, priesthood and materialism, priesthood and homosexuality, priesthood and marriage, priesthood and politics, priesthood and ethics, priesthood and dogma of faith, sisterhood and marriage, sisterhood and lesbianism, ecumenism, Church and jihadism, church and fanaticism, church and politics, church and economy, church and ICT, Church and internal and global insecurity, Church and customs and Church and traditional religions, etc.
It is recalled that the last Vatican Council, knownas the Second Vatican Council or Vatican II, addressed relations between the Catholic Church and the modern world. The council, through the Holy See, was formally opened under the pontificate of Pope John XXIII on 11 October 1962 and was closed under Pope Paul VI on the Solemnity of the Immaculate Conception on 8 December 1965. Attendance varied in later sessions from 2,100 to over 2,300. In addition, a varying number of periti (Latin: “experts”) were available for theological consultation—a group that turned out to have a major influence as the council went forward. Seventeen Orthodox Churches and Protestant denominations; in addition to Catholic Lay Council sent observers. More than three dozen representatives of other Christian communities were present at the opening session, and the number grew to nearly 100 by the end of the 4th Council Sessions.
According to Pope Benedict XVI, the most important and essential message of the council is “the Paschal Mystery as the center of what it is to be Christian and therefore of the Christian life, the Christian year and the Christian seasons”. Other changes which followed the council included the widespread use of vernacular languages in the Mass instead of Latin, the subtle disuse of ornate clerical regalia, the revision of Eucharistic prayers, the abbreviation of the liturgical calendar, the ability to celebrate the Mass versus populum(with the officiant facing the congregation), as well as ad orientem(facing the “East” and the Crucifix), etc.
Of those who took part in the council’s opening session, four have become popes: Cardinal Giovanni Battista Montini, who on succeeding John XXIII took the name Pope Paul VI; Bishop Albino Luciani, the future Pope John Paul I; Bishop Karol Wojtyła, who became Pope John Paul II; and Joseph Ratzinger, present as a theological consultant, who became Pope Benedict XVI.
The First Vatican Council, which was the 20th ecumenical council of the Roman Catholic Church had taken place from 1869–70 and was convoked by Pope Pius IX to deal with contemporary problems including controversies thrown up by rationalism, liberalism, materialism, inspiration of Scripture and papal infallibility, among others.
Pope Paul VI (June 1963-August 1978) had in his opening address on 29 September 1963 stressed the pastoral nature of the council, and set out four purposes for it: (1) to define more fully the nature of the Church and the role of the bishop; (2) to renew the Church; (3) to restore unity among all Christians, including seeking pardon for Catholic contributions to separation; and (4) and to start a dialogue with the contemporary world.
During this period, the bishops further approved the constitution on the liturgy, Sacrosanctum Concilium, the decree on social communication and Inter mirifica, among others. Work went forward with the schemata on the Church, bishops and dioceses, and ecumenism.
Signed:
For: Int’l Society for Civil Liberties & the Rule of Law
The Catholic Diocese of Enugu has distanced itself from the endorsement of some governors of the South-East and candidates contesting different political positions by the Spiritual Director of Adoration Ministry, Enugu, Nigeria (AMEN), Reverend Fr. Ejike Mbaka.
The church said it has not endorsed any candidate for the 2019 general elections.
Mbaka had, during the bazaar of his ministry in Enugu, last Sunday, embarrassed the vice presidential candidate of the People’s DemocraticParty (PDP), Peter Obi, for not publicly announcing what he would do for the ministry and also accused him of being stingy, an action that has been roundly condemned by the Catholic Church.
Speaking in an interview last night, Director of Communications, Catholic Diocese of Enugu, Rev. Fr. Benjamin Achi said the church is apolitical and the church does not take any political position at any time.
“The church is apolitical.
The church doesn’t take any political position at any time and the Catholic Bishops Conference of Nigeria (CBCN), a couple of weeks ago, issued an official statement to that effect; that the pulpit should not be used for any political campaign or the priest coming out to endorse any candidate as against the other. So, there has been official statement to that effect by CBCN.
So, anything on the contrary is against what the church is teaching.
“He doesn’t represent the official position of the church because the church’s position has always been clear and that is what the position of the church has always been, and it hasn’t changed yet. Church officials don’t come out and make political statements or say things that might suggest that one political candidate is endorsed as against the other, no. It is against the church’s mode of operation.
It is against the church’s principles,” he said.
Meanwhile, a renowned Prophet in Enugu, Anthony Nwoko, has lashed at Fr. Mbaka and said he (Mbaka) is not operating with the spirit of holiness.
“Mbaka is not a man of God. He has been deceiving the world. The man that will rule the world is in Enugu and Mbaka could not see it.”
President Mohamed Buhari has finally responded to Nnamdi Kanu broadcast, about Jubril from Sudan impersonating him.
The advise from Asari Dokubo to Nnamdi Kanu is the climax while a critical analysis of the entire event as it unfolds was anchored by Asuzu Chinedu Peters.
Click on the link to download our Apps:
Andriod Version :
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=bvi.channel1.com
Windows Version:
https://www.microsoft.com/store/apps/…
iOS
https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/bvich…
Support:
Click On This Link To Donate Towards BVI Channel 1 Community Project.
Special request to all our fans:
To our viewers, you can partner with BVI Channel by sponsoring our online T.V Programs as we look forward to generate enough fund to lunch our satellite T.V
Also, to support our effort, please allow adverts on our content to play to the end and also be kind enough to patronize our advertisers.
If you love this video why not subscribe to our Channel for more video updates by clicking on the link below:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6DL…
For constant Biafra News Update please visit our website:
www.bvichannel1.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/BVIChannel1/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/BVIChannel1
Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+IPOBGOVT…
If you wish to contact BVI Channel 1 for anything
(Advert, Video coverage & Complains and Suggestions )
Please call +2348104545533 or +2348104207522.
We hope you will check daily for video update.
Cheers.
This is the height of madness from both political and religious fronts.
Now, Mbaka and politicians have turned adoration ground into political prigrimage where money exchange hands for election favours.
This trend is becoming dangerous to our society and it have to stop.
Click on the link to download our Apps:
Andriod Version :
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=bvi.channel1.com
Windows Version:
https://www.microsoft.com/store/apps/…
iOS
https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/bvich…
Support:
Click On This Link To Donate Towards BVI Channel 1 Community Project.
Special request to all our fans:
To our viewers, you can partner with BVI Channel by sponsoring our online T.V Programs as we look forward to generate enough fund to lunch our satellite T.V
Also, to support our effort, please allow adverts on our content to play to the end and also be kind enough to patronize our advertisers.
If you love this video why not subscribe to our Channel for more video updates by clicking on the link below:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6DL…
For constant Biafra News Update please visit our website:
www.bvichannel1.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/BVIChannel1/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/BVIChannel1
Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+IPOBGOVT…
If you wish to contact BVI Channel 1 for anything
(Advert, Video coverage & Complains and Suggestions )
Please call +2348104545533 or +2348104207522.
We hope you will check daily for video update.
Cheers.
The Chairman of MOBIN (Movement of Biafrans in Nigeria) and Biafra Project Phase 2-Barr Emeka Emekesiri is presently in Abuja to attend an event put together by Alaigbo Development Foundation (ADF) ,Abuja Branch.Barr Emeka was invited as one of the Discussants to dissect the topic – ‘ The Place Of The Igboman In The Present Day Nigeria: Historical Prognosis Into The Future;.He will be discussing the topic alongside Barr Tony Nnadi,Dr Sam Amadi,Dr Paddy Njoku under the Chairmanship of Chief Lucius Nwosu ,SAN.
This book is available for sale.Call 08036247812
BVI Channel 1 can confirm that the event has attracted great Igbo Sons and Daughters across the world and much is being expected from the august gathering of the best among ndigbo.
Barr Max Ozoaka is the Chairman ,ADF Abuja Branch.
Biafrans in politics have started meeting daily and coming up with strategies they will use to ensure that the first anointed Biafran politician wins Anambra central 2019 senatorial election. This was made known to pressmen today by Obumneke Ejimnkeonye Okafor after his meeting with the Chairman of MOBIN, Barrister Emeka Emekesiri, who flew in from London to ensure that proper steps are taken to ensure victory in the polls.
Obumneke Ejimnkeonye Okafor who was nominated by National Conscience Party (NCP) to contest for Anambra central senatorial election and endorsed by Biafrans stated that he will defeat Chief Victor Umeh of APGA and the candidates that PDP and APC will field. He said that APGA, APC and PDP in Anambra central are confused and cannot get their acts together. Furthermore, he said that the withdrawal of Iyom Uche Ekwunife and Chief Charles Odunukwe who were formerly nominated by APC and PDP respectively is a clear sign of the parties’ disorderliness in the zone.
On APGA, he said that the party is entangled in series of crises which will affect its performance in 2019 general elections. Finally, he said that with Biafrans backing him and with the block votes he will get, he is sure victory. He thanked Biafrans for finding him worthy to be the voice of freedom in senate.
I had wanted to avoid commenting on your latest political alignment, but key and respected leaders in Alaigbo Development Foundation (ADF) have urged otherwise. They advised that my comment on behalf of ADF was necessary in view of the fact that you had fraternized with ADF at the very early days of its formation.
I still remember the theme you and I had agreed as the subject of your paper presented at the 2014 International Colloquium on the Igbo Question in Nigeria: Before, During and After Biafra. That paper was captioned “The Role of the Party System in the Resolution of the Igbo Question in Nigeria” (Chapter 26 of the IGBO NATION: History and Challenges of Rebirth and Development, vol. 1 pp. 559-575 published by Kraft Books Ltd, Ibadan (2015)
In that paper you brilliantly showed that Political Parties carry out the function of articulation and aggregation of social and political interests within the wider society.
The question then is whose social and political interests do political parties articulate and aggregate within any given society?
In our political science classes, we were taught that politics itself is power struggle among social forces. Experience, however, teaches all through the ages that, in a multi-ethnic society, the most potent social forces are ethnic nationalities not individuals.
This reality is clearly captured in your Colloquium paper where you gave account of the formation of various political parties to advance the interests of the competing nationalities in the Nigerian Federation, viz-
I. The Northern Peoples’ Congress (NPC) – under the leadership of Sir Ahmadu Bello, the Sardauna of Sokoto which articulated and aggregated the interests of the Fulani caliphate. The NPC was later replaced by the NPN
II. The Northern Elements Progressive Union (NEPU) led by Aminu Kano that championed the interests of the Fulani-dominated Hausas (Talakawas). The Peoples’ Redemption Party (PRP) later took the place of the NEPU.
III. The United Middle Belt Congress (UMBC) led by Joseph Tarka for the protecting and advancing the interest of the Middle Belt particularly the TIV.
IIII. The GNPP led by Waziri Ibrahim for the interest of the Kanuri.
V. The Action Group, AG (later the UPN) was obviously formed to protect and advance the interests of the Yoruba.
VI. The NCNC, though it started its journey as an idealist pan-national party, eventually settled as a party dominated by Igbo interest. It later replaced by the NPP, truly to defend and advance Igbo political interests.
VII. We are aware of the emergence of big alliances of political parties such as Nigerian National Alliance (NNA) that brought together the NPC and the Nigerian National Democratic Party (NNDP), as well as the United Progressive Grand Alliance (UPGA), that brought together the Action Group and the NCNC. In each case there was no doubt as to which of the Alliance partners was in charge.
VIII. Today we know who is the master among the alliance-partners in the APC, even though it is a pro-Caliphate and a pro-Yoruba coalition.
IX. The All Progressive Grand Alliance (APGA), which you played a key role to midwife, was ideally meant to defend the interests of Ndigbo in a multi-ethnic Federation.
According to you, APGA was also meant to be an instrument available to Ndigbo, in your own words, for “political resurgence, dialogue, negotiation, reconciliation and economic relevance. Our internal cohesion, unity and respectability in and outside Nigeria are equally dependent on our pragmatic pursuit of the Political Party System”.
When you lost your place in the APGA, you formed the United Peoples Party (UPP); a move we considered as an act of political courage. But now, in the light of the above, where does UPP stand? I mean in the APC coalition, for what purpose – personal or Igbo interest?
Some of us have maintained that politics in Nigeria is like the Game vampires play. And it is increasingly becoming vampirish by the day. In such a situation the society, especially Alaigbo need exorcists. You met us on the tuff of the Alaigbo Development Foundation (ADF) attempting to play the role of exorcist in our political terrain. And as such, those who see political parties as trading companies (a la the immortal Ikenna Nzimiro) are bound to feel strange within it.
When the news about your present political alignment came to us, those who do not know that political party game in Nigeria is the game vampires play or that what the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) register are mainly political trading companies came to me shouting Eh tu Brutius Ojoleigbo!
The Alaigbo Development Foundation (ADF) has already stated her position on the 2019 Elections, giving reasons why the Buhari ticket cannot be endorsed. Among the grave reasons that border on the security of Alaigbo and the rest of the Federation, there is the equally frightening case of the resurgence of the Boko Haram insurgency together with the frightening admission of President Buhari that his regime is incapable of defeating the Boko Haram forces. When you further add the fact that his regime has released, retrained and recruited condemned Boko Haram insurgents into the Nigerian military, then you will agree with us that we are suffering two composite disabilities that add up to a state of total failure of governance, total anarchy.
The story is told about those days during the Vietnamese war with America, and because it was a war situation, the Vietnamese soldiers – the Vietcong – had to resort to the highest level of ideological purity and commitment to defend their people. America was fighting and physically decimating the Vietnamese soldiers – the Vietcong, just like the Vietcong were doing the same. Often the Vietcong would capture the American business men, those referred to as the imperialists or capitalists, the great enemies of their people. When they do, they would be offered bags of dollar by their American captives in exchange for their release.
The poor Vietcong freedom fighters would receive the bags of dollars. In front of them, they would pour fuel on the bags and set the whole money ablaze. After that, they would still kill their victim. In order words, for Vietcong to accept the money, the bribe money was an abomination, evil, aru!. To them, no quantum of dollars could be exchanged for their peoples’ freedom.
An average business man or even any less ideologically mature person from anywhere could reason, why not accept the money and still kill him. It appears that the Vietnamese ideological spirit was as strong as the spirit of Ofor ndi ebeanyi.
As long as our commitment to the liberation of our people is dominated by the spirit of izu okwe, iwere nka irie nkaozo, we shall be going no where. As long as it is dominated by the spirit of those oracles in our society which had become bastardized, especially during the slave trade era in our history, when the oracles, especially the Long juju of Arochukwu had became instruments of slavery, we shall continue to run in circles, engaging in useless propaganda, while the enemy continues to decimate us physically, economically and politically.
Perhaps Ojeligbo, you were too busy during the period of your sojourn in ADF to understand that it is the fundamental belief of ADF that the freedom of our people cannot be exchanged for anything not even billions of naira or dollars.
The ADF advocacy of Regional Autonomy (or an Independent Republic) surely goes with the existence of Regional Political Party that is an organizer of the people and an instrument of political and economic struggle and resurgence, and not as a trading company guided by banal pragmatism.
There is a brother I met during our recent visit to the US. He is a man full of ideas and gets on very well with the low and the mighty. Our brothers Christopher Okoli and Ezeji Alozie Aguwa know him. Each time he writes a piece for the attention of his friends, he ends up with chew on this! I think what he means is like Herbert Ogunde’s Yoruba Ronu!
Ndigbo, Uche Unu Odikwa Nihe Naganu Ugbua!
Umuigbo chew on this development – the recent political alignment of Chief Chekwas Okorie, alias Ojeligbo and others in the current political dispensation. Brother Chief Chekwas, please chew on it, given the realities of our political predicament that have never changed since the days of APGA.
Finally, let me quote the words of brother Chekwas in the paper he presented during the 2014 ADF Colloquium, According to him,
“The Role of Party System in the Resolution of the Igbo Question In Nigeria,” has agitated my mind for a long time. The apparent lack of interest or ignorance or knowledge of the role of a political party in any democracy in advancing the cause of a people, protecting, promoting and defending their political interest by pioneer Igbo Political Leaders who preferred to be joiners instead of founders of Political Parties is most scandalous.
Please Ojeligbo (what a title!)
Chew on this!
Prof Uzodinma Nwala is the President of Alaigbo Development Foundation
Civilized men are easy to conqure, but civilization still belong to the civilized not the baberian, it belongs to whomever is strong enough to take.
Any society without history is a society that is bound to become a vitim of history overtime.
We learn from history to avoid the mistakes of the past, to understand our strenght, and to sustain our core values that makes us unique, which our forebearers treded with.
This is a historical lecture delivered in memory of Biafra legend by Prof. Chidi A. Odinkalu
Click on the link to download our Apps:
Andriod Version :
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=bvi.channel1.com
Windows Version:
https://www.microsoft.com/store/apps/…
iOS
https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/bvich…
Support:
Click On This Link To Donate Towards BVI Channel 1 Community Project.
Special request to all our fans:
To our viewers, you can partner with BVI Channel by sponsoring our online T.V Programs as we look forward to generate enough fund to lunch our satellite T.V
Also, to support our effort, please allow adverts on our content to play to the end and also be kind enough to patronize our advertisers.
If you love this video why not subscribe to our Channel for more video updates by clicking on the link below:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6DL…
For constant Biafra News Update please visit our website:
www.bvichannel1.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/BVIChannel1/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/BVIChannel1
Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+IPOBGOVT…
If you wish to contact BVI Channel 1 for anything
(Advert, Video coverage & Complains and Suggestions )
Please call +2348104545533 or +2348104207522.
We hope you will check daily for video update.
Cheers.
Senate President and Director General of the Peoples Democratic Party,PDP, Presidential Campaign Council, Bukola Saraki ,yesterday, faulted Vice President Yemi Osinbajo’s ongoing tour of markets in the country saying monies being handed over to traders were not budgeted to be shared to Nigerians by officials of the All Progressives Congress, APC.
He also described the development as “sophisticated vote buying.” The DG said this at an interactive session with newsmen in Abuja. Saraki said it was wrong for the Vice President to be distributing monies belonging to Nigerians, accompanied by leaders of the ruling party. He said: “In 2015, I didn’t see the Vice President going anywhere to give anybody Trader Moni. In 2016, I didn’t see the Vice President going anywhere to give anybody Trader Moni. In 2017, I didn’t see the Vice President going anywhere to give anybody Trader Moni. But all of a sudden in 2018, we are seeing this. “He goes about with the Woman Leader of his party, APC, and governors of his party.
At least, if you are going, you should have Woman Leader of all the parties because the money belongs to Nigeria. But all I see is APC Women Leaders. It is wrong, it is morally wrong. It equates in a way to sophisticated vote buying. If it is not vote-buying he should have been doing it since 2015. In 2016, he didn’t do it. In 2017, he didn’t do it. Suddenly in 2018, that is the biggest programme. “And next time he goes out, he should carry people that represent the community, not just one party or political association.
It’s either they stop it completely or they expand the space to ensure that it represents all Nigerians. “Because the money when it was appropriated, we said it is money appropriated for all Nigerians. “What we will be saying to Nigerians is that it is our belief that, with our candidate, we have a leader who understands what is required in moving the economy forward.
Is the economy better now and is it worse than it was in 2015? Are people suffering more now than they were in 2015? “The reality is this. We need a candidate that can drive investments and bring the factories back working, bring the business economy working again. “Government alone cannot do it and the government has tried to do it in the last few years and it has not worked and unless you have a President that people believe in the investment climate will not be conducive. “We need somebody that will unite the country.
we believe that Atiku has shown he is a Nigerian. Every part of the country will feel that he will represent them. Responding to a statement by the APC warning against issuing an entry visa to Atiku, Saraki described same as an indication that the ruling party is panicking ahead of the poll.
George H.W. Bush was the definition of establishment success: Yale graduate. Prosperous business career. Forty-first president of the United States.
But to one admittedly biased observer, the elder Bush has always been shortchanged.
“As a result of him being a one-term president, historians hadn’t paid much attention to him,” George W. Bush told NPR in a 2014 interview. He called his father “one of the greatest one-term presidents in the nation’s history.”
George Herbert Walker Bush died Friday at the age of 94.
George W. Bush released a statement, saying for himself and his siblings, “Jeb, Neil, Marvin, Doro, and I are saddened to announce that after 94 remarkable years, our dear Dad has died.”
“George H.W. Bush was a man of the highest character and the best dad a son or daughter could ask for,” he said. “The entire Bush family is deeply grateful for 41’s life and love, for the compassion of those who have cared and prayed for Dad, and for the condolences of our friends and fellow citizens.”
There were fears that after his wife, Barbara, died in April, Bush might die, too. He was admitted to the hospital with a blood infection on April 23, one day after the funeral for the former first lady, and remained there for 13 days. He also spent time in the hospital in May and June, but lived to be the first former president to reach the age of 94.
Bush was the patriarch of a political dynasty that included one son who served as president, another as a governor and a grandson who currently holds statewide office in Texas.
The senior Bush had a lifetime of public service before he became president — as a young Navy pilot in World War II, Texas congressman, CIA director and faithful vice president to Ronald Reagan.
“His loyalty to Ronald Reagan was legendary,” said biographer Timothy Naftali. “He did not always agree with Ronald Reagan. And he was so secretive about those moments where he disagreed, we don’t even have good documentation — at least not available yet — on when he disagreed.”
Bush famously disagreed with Reagan when he ran against him in the Republican primary of 1980. Bush branded Reagan’s supply-side faith that government could slash tax rates without losing revenue as “voodoo economic policy.”
“Read my lips,” Bush pledged at the 1988 GOP convention. “No new taxes.”
Bush trounced Democrat Michael Dukakis that year to win the White House. But he ultimately backtracked on his lip-reading promise. During 1990 budget negotiations with Democratic congressional leaders, Bush, like Reagan before him, agreed to a tax increase.
His press secretary, Marlin Fitzwater, recalled a budget meeting where the deal was presented.
“The minute I saw it, I looked around the table and the Democrats looked like the cat who ate the canary,” Fitzwater said. “They knew they had negotiated a winner.”
The tax hike cut the deficit, but it cost Bush dearly with conservatives. Years later, he would receive a Profile in Courage award from John F. Kennedy’s grandson, who said, “America’s gain was President Bush’s loss.”
Bush’s most notable accomplishments in the White House came in the area of foreign policy. While Reagan is often credited with winning the Cold War, it was Bush who successfully navigated the aftermath. His low-key approach avoided inflaming communist hard-liners and allowed for the peaceful breakup of the Soviet Union.
“The soft landing that occurred, which was not inevitable, is in large measure due to George H.W. Bush’s diplomacy,” said Naftali.
Bush, who served as U.S. envoy to China as well as a globe-trotting vice president, had a thick Rolodex and plenty of experience working the phones. His lifetime of foreign contacts also came in handy when Iraqi troops invaded Kuwait in 1990. Bush methodically assembled an international coalition to push them back.
A five-week bombing campaign was followed by a 100-hour ground assault that routed the Iraqis from Kuwait. Some wanted allied troops to push on to Baghdad and topple Saddam Hussein. But Bush said no.
“The president’s decision was we are not going on to Baghdad,” the late diplomat Lawrence Eagleburger recalled. “If we do, we will have violated the agreement we have with our allies, which was to bring Saddam out of Kuwait. It was not to bring Saddam down. And in addition, it will tie us into an area where we cannot be sure how soon we can withdraw.”
Bush’s son George W. would revisit that decision a dozen years later, with costly results.
The first Gulf War was a clear victory for U.S. forces. As commander in chief, George H.W. Bush saw his approval ratings soar to nearly 90 percent. His lock on a second term seemed so solid, many national Democrats opted to sit out the 1992 election, leaving it to the governor of a small Southern state to challenge him.
Bill Clinton had one big advantage, though: the economy, stupid. As the country sank into recession, Bush’s popularity sank with it. There was no parachute or soft landing this time. He lost a three-way race in the November election, carrying just 38 percent of the vote.
More than two decades later, George W. Bush, who experienced his own roller coaster ride in the polls, wrote an affectionate portrait of his father, titled 41.
“I want people to better appreciate George Bush, as not only a great person but a very successful president,” the younger Bush said.
Bush was also the linchpin of a political dynasty that now spans four generations — including a second son, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, who ran for the White House and lost in the 2016 Republican primaries as Donald Trump became the dominant force in a GOP that had evolved far from where it was when the 41st president was in office.
Whatever the senior Bush’s political shortcomings, hindsight has cast his presidency in a kinder, gentler light.