Wednesday, June 17, 2026
Home Blog Page 279

Video:GGM Speaks And Government Listens

Anambra 21:Abuja Court to decide disqualification suit against Soludo Nov. 30

A Federal High Court sitting in Abuja has fixed November 30 for judgment in the suit challenging the qualification of Anambra State governor-elect, Prof. Charles Soludo of the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) to contest the recently-held governorship election in the state.

The plaintiffs alleged that Soludo provided false information in Form EC9 that he submitted to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), hence, should be disqualified for the election.

They alleged that Soludo indicated in the affidavit that he was contesting Aguata 2 Constituency seat when he was actually contesting the Anambra governorship seat.

Defendants in the suit are the Independent National Electoral Commission, the All Progressives Grand Alliance, Soludo and the Deputy governor-elect, Onyeka Ibezim.

Lawyers to the plaintiffs argued that Soludo indicated the wrong seat he was contesting, supplied INEC with false information, violated extant legal provisions, thus should be disqualified.

The presiding judge, Justice Taiwo Taiwo fixed the date after lawyers to the parties made their final submissions.

Source: elombah

Terrorists may Take Over Nigeria – Benue Gov. Predicts

Benue State Governor, Samuel Ortom has warned that terrorists may overrun Nigeria if nothing is done to curb the security situation in the country.

Addressing journalists in Abuja on Tuesday, the Governor lamented that Nigerians are “under siege.”

He said over 1,700 people have been killed in Benue State since Buhari became President.

According to Ortom: “Terrorists would overrun the country in no distant time.

All Progressives Congress (APC)- led government did not only fail Nigerians, but has also appeared helpless in the fight against insecurity and has shown that it has no capacity to fix the economy, agriculture and education”.

The Governor also disclosed that about 1.5 million people have been rendered homeless and currently sheltered in camps for Internally Displaced Person (IDPs) across Benue State.

He decried that most of these IDPs have no hope of returning to their ancestral homes soon.

(Journalist101)

EndSars: Lagos Panel Releases Names of Those Massacred at Lekki Toll Gate

The Lagos State Judicial Panel of Inquiry on Restitution for Victims of SARS Related Abuses and Other Matters (Lagos EndSARS Panel), has released a list of forty-eight casualties from the Lekki Tollgate incident.

Anyone with emotion will always have goose pimples whenever, he/she remembers the incident that happened on October, especially 20th, 2020, where a good number of Nigerian citizens were allegedly massacred, police stations burnt, as anarchy descended on us.

Be that as it may, the Lagos EndSARS Panel , yesterday submitted its report, accusing the Nigerian Army and Police force of shooting at the innocent protesters at Lekki Tollgate, last year.

In its report, Members of the Panel chaired by HONOURABLE JUSTICE DORIS OKUWOBI (RTD) submitted that: “The atrocious maiming and killing of unarmed, helpless and unresisting protesters, while sitting on the floor and waving their Nigerian flags, while singing the National Anthem can be equated to a ‘massacre’ in context. “

The Panel equally stated that “Apart from the military men in uniform, the Army left its base with vehicles, rifles and guns, which contained both live and blank bullets. General Taiwo admitted at page 22 that the Army went to the Lekki Toll Gate with live ammunition.

The Panel finds as credible, the case of the EndSARS protesters that soldiers shot directly at protesters at the Lekki Toll Gate on October 20, 2020 as confirmed by Lagos State Ballistic Expert, Willie-Harry on page 244 that some video evidence indicate “… instances where troops were seen to be re-arming their weapons before either discharging them to the air or purposely in the direction of the protesters …”

Based on the report presented by the Lagos state Judicial panel, which accused the Nigerian Army and Police of mishandling the incident at Lekki Tollgate through firing of live bullets which as reported killed a good number of Nigerian citizens, one would say that it contradicts the Press Conference  of the minister of Information, Alhaji Lai Mohammed, where he averred that: “The military did not shoot at protesters at the Lekki Toll Gate on Oct. 20th 2020, and there was no massacre at the toll gate. The only ‘massacre’ recorded was in the social media, hence there were neither bodies nor blood.”

(Vanguard)

 

Student Beats Lecturer to Coma at Ilorin University

The University of Ilorin student, Waliyullah Salaudeen, who beat his female lecturer to stupor has opened up on why he reacted violently to the female academic identified as Mrs Zakariyau.

Viral footage that graced social media showed how the 400 level student was apprehended by the school security personnel after he beat up the lecturer on Thursday, November 11 in the school premises.

According to Daily Trust, Waliyullah Salaudeen of the department of microbiology said he was in detention for two months before the ugly incident of that fateful Thursday.

Narrating the reason behind his detention, the student popularly known as Captain Walz said he had visited Allen Avenue in Ikeja, Lagos State to see a friend for the first time and felt the urge to urinate while waiting for the person.

Walz claimed that while urinating near a car packed by a gutter, he was accused of being a thief and was heavily descended on by a mob. “I urinated near a car parked by drainage and challenged by one of the workers there. “I was then accused of being a thief and was not allowed to explain myself before a mob descended.

I was severely beaten and handed over to the police which led to my detention for two months.

Upon his release, Walz said he had visited the female lecturer’s office to help him wave his mandatory SIWES scheme. He said the lecturer said there was nothing to be done and ordered him out of her office. “…She said there was no help to offer, except I joined the next set which would result in an extra year. “On the fateful Thursday when I entered her office, she ordered me out…

Walz said he got angry and was arguing with her when she threw a mug at him which he claimed got him injured. This Walz said infuriated him and thus, descended on the lecturer.

Meanwhile, Legit.ng previously reported that the vice-chancellor of UNILORIN has given an update on the beaten lecturer’s state of health.

The Vice-Chancellor, University of Ilorin, Professor Sulyman Abdulkareem has in a recently released statement said the lecturer is in a stable condition. The Vice-Chancellor described the incident as sad and unfortunate, assuring that justice would be done on the matter. He ordered proper care of the victim on the bill of the university and reiterated his commitment to the welfare of all staff and law-abiding students of the institution.

(Legit)

OKORIE: SOLUDO’S VICTORY COULD TRIGGER APGA’s RESURGENCE

Chief Chekwas Okorie, the founder of All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA), but now a chieftain of All Progressives Congress (APC), in this interview, describes APC’s loss at the Anambra State governorship election as self-inflicted, stressing that Prof. Chukwuma Soludo’s victory could revitalise APGA.

*_As a chieftain of APC and from your perspective as an experienced politician, do you think that the outcome and processes in last Saturday’s Anambra State governorship poll are enough to gauge APC’s acceptability in the Southeast?_*

No. the APC of today in the Southeast has improved so much in terms of acceptability. There has been obvious infrastructural development and what you may call federal presence in the Southeast that never existed since the war ended in 1970. These things are there for everybody to see.

The issue of the Second Niger Bridge will continue to be a landmark project that will stand the test of time. It has been recorded in history and will not be forgotten by Ndigbo for a very long time to come. Due to the circumstance of that project, I remember very well that the Ariaria Power Project was built and commissioned by President Muhammadu Buhari. It was commissioned in 2018 when Buhari came to campaign at Aba for his second term in office. It became the very first Federal Government project started and completed anywhere in the Southeast since 1970. A small project that individuals could even afford was the first project the Federal Government of Nigeria ever started and completed. Mark the word ‘completed’ because our place was littered with uncompleted and abandoned projects, which gave the impression that it was a deliberate decision not to complete those projects.

We are now looking at roads to be completed with quality that is far better than the original construction; they are all ongoing. Because of this and more, so many people who were not in APC have been attracted to APC in the Southeast. I mean people who are opinion leaders and have won elections in other parties, especially the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), who at one time dominated the entire Southeast since 1999.

Now, the situation is that from a position that five states were PDP and state assemblies were all PDP, PDP now has two states. APC has two states, Ebonyi and Imo, so PDP has declined from five to four and now, it is just two. So, you can therefore say APC is growing in the Southeast.

Unfortunately, the Anambra governorship election became a dampener to a steady progress that was already being recorded. And, as a member of APC, I would not hesitate without any fear of equivocation to say that what happened in Anambra State was self-inflicted and many of us warned that this was going to happen, but unfortunately our well-considered opinion was not heeded.

We did not come out publicly to announce it as if we were in the opposition, rather we used machinery of the party that we had access to, but we did not appear to have received the attention required.

Another thing is that nobody, who is fair-minded, would deny the fact that APGA campaigned far more vigorously than any other party in that contest. While others were running away from gunmen and even taking their campaigns outside of Anambra, APGA was everywhere and it is not as if their campaign trains were not attacked, but they were not deterred. They carried on with the campaign.

If APGA did not win that election, to me, it would have been against the run of play, but that election was won in accordance with the run of play and I have not hesitated in sending my congratulatory message to Soludo, because I believe he won the election. I believe we in APC will learn from it.

The era of imposition is over and the empowerment of the electorate as the true sovereigns in determining who rules over them at all levels is beginning to gain grounds through determination by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to allow it happen. So, campaigns will now be taken to the people if anybody wants to win election.

*_Talking about imposition, we saw situations where stomach infrastructure was spurned, especially in Enugwu-Ukwu and Dunukofia. Do you think a new era of voter enlightenment has entered into the electoral system?_*

By that, do you mean vote buying? It was more brazen in 2017. In 2017, our party then, United Progressives Party (UPP) led Osita Chidoka to election. I relocated to Anambra myself, because I am not from Anambra State and we campaigned vigorously; we went to every nook and cranny. The reception was good; the youths were with Chidoka.

Do not forget that Chidoka played a key role in Nnamdi Kanu’s matter. He was one of those who signed Kanu’s bail and drove him from Kuje Prison to the hotel before he travelled to Umuahia. That was very fresh in the minds of the people in 2017 and so they were rooting for him.

But what happened on the day of election? A little kiosk was put up with sacks of money and votes were being bought. The voters had all the latitude to take photographs of the ballot paper with their phones after they voted. And with the picture, they went to the kiosk to collect their money. The minimum that was paid for each vote was N5000. In some places where they needed to really drive the message home, the figure got up to N10, 000 and in his (Chidoka’s) polling unit, it was raised to N20, 000 per vote. The vote buying was reported by some TV stations that covered the election and people saw what happened. It was made public. The security officers will tell you that their duty is to maintain law and order and if you feel aggrieved, go and bring your money and buy votes.

It was like a rehearsed answer, because our people complained about it everywhere. Of course, that will not amount to anything because you have to prove it and show how it affected the outcome of the election. That was near impossible. People could hardly see where bags of money were kept for distribution. Whatever happens, APGA earned this victory by my own assessment. In fact, others tried to buy, but perhaps they were ‘out-bidded’ because it was a bazaar.

This is where our laws will have to be strengthened, because now, the carrying of ballot boxes has fizzled out due to the new regulations and processes. There is no room for thugs; there is no job for them. Those who hire thugs would no longer find the need to spend money hiring them, so the thugs would be unengaged during elections.

The new craze (vote buying) has to be addressed now. If it is addressed, the ordinary man will now have more confidence that he can influence who becomes his leader, but generally, I think there is an improvement.
The vote tally showed that though protesting aspirants veered into otherwise fringe political parties. Does the predominance of big parties now necessitate further pruning of the number of political parties?

It is the law that we are operating that is the issue. In fact, I find the whole thing funny, because based on the law, INEC is on the verge of registering more parties. If you have applied, INEC has no power to deny you registration and yet we are talking about pruning. My original thinking was that political parties would fizzle out on their own, especially as the government is no longer giving stipends or grants.

When you are unable to fund a political party, you will close shop, but the government came with the order that certain conditions will be made. Yet you did not stop or make the registration of parties more stringent. Some people who said they were charting the third force have seen the futility in doing that. Any moment from now they would adopt an existing party and converge there because it is easier to change the name than register a new one. Reducing the number of parties should be by political action and not by executive fiat or some legal constraint.

*_Anambra is seen as epicentre of Southeast politics. Do you foresee a resurgence of APGA consciousness in the entire Southeast?_*

I see a bright future or silver lining at the end of the tunnel, where what is happening in Anambra now can trigger resurgence. Soludo is a person who, since after he left the CBN, has been involved in quite a lot of Igbo-related activities.

In Ohanaeze, he has headed some committees and done his own bit with Igbo elite groups, where Igbo issues are discussed. So, he is in a good position to use the instrumentality of his new office to promote the resurgence of that party. Incidentally, you are asking the founder of the party, myself, because there was a vision that was not in any way to limit its activities to one state.

It is actually a tragedy because, in June 2022, APGA would be 20 years old and in 20 years, we have not even moved away from Awka, Anambra State and the party is not even in total control of Anambra State. It is just the governorship; other parties control the National Assembly seats. That is not what was intended.

APGA was not intended to be just an Igbo party; it was supposed to be a national party based on the Igbo initiative. The projection was that APGA would be a platform for political engagement with the rest of Nigeria and a platform that would drive the issues of inclusion and restructuring, using the political and democratic scene.

APGA was intended to be a safe political habitat for all the ethnic minorities in Nigeria that feel marginalised, excluded and oppressed. It was supposed to be a platform for them to make demands politically and get them because nothing political is given free of charge.

We know that the aggregate of the minority ethnic groups in Nigeria will give you an overwhelming majority, so that promise that APGA held was truncated two years after its registration. Everything we did for eight years after registration was to see if the soul and spirit of APGA could be saved from destruction. And by 2012, it became obvious that the people holding on to it saw APGA as a cash cow just to serve a few persons. And the treasury of Anambra State was sufficient for them because they did not have a bigger vision. Many of us, who were the vision-bearers, was crying on the inside and hoping that God at one point or the other will give life back to that party.

I remember that out of anger, I voluntarily returned the certificate of APGA to INEC. No court order asked me to do so; nobody said I was no longer the chairman. My case was being struck out on technical grounds. We still had ongoing cases.

We took a decision to suspend further litigations and I called our lawyers and advised them that we were going to discontinue litigation. So, we took the certificate with a forwarding letter to INEC and then addressed the media, where I said that we returned a mere carcass to them and that we had gone away with the spirit and soul.

Some people said it was a curse. And somehow, God gave efficacy to that statement, because it came from an injured mind. Do not forget that APGA was the only political party dedicated to God through an interdenominational thanksgiving service at the Nnamdi Azikiwe Stadium.

No other party in Nigeria, before and after, has been so dedicated to God. So, when that pronouncement came, it was as if God heard and held us to His grace. This is why I think Governor Obiano also has a date with history, because he still has time to work in collaboration with the one person he worked with, Soludo, to ensure that APGA is given what it takes to re-launch the party.

*_You founded APGA. At what point did the late Ikemba Nnewi, Chief Emeka Odumegwu, become part of the party?_*

APGA was a product of three attempts to register a political party with the Igbo initiative. In 1996, we tried to register People Democratic Congress with INEC. We failed because the conditions were quite stringent. We could not be considered amidst the conditions.

In 1998, we made a second attempt; we also failed. In 2001, when there was another opportunity for party registration, we made a third attempt and used the name UPGA (United Progressives Grand Alliance), but somewhere along the line, INEC ordered that any name and logo used before would not be used again.

We changed the name from UPGA to APGA and the symbol of cock, which the National Convention of Nigerian Citizens (NCNC) used, was changed to stand on that acronym, APGA. That became the symbol, so we succeeded at the third attempt.

Chief Odumegwu Ojukwu was not part of the process of registration. The party’s certificate was issued on June 24, 2002. The announcement was on a Saturday, June 22, 2002, and we returned to Enugu with the certificate.

In Abuja, the first person we took the certificate to in celebration of what had happened was the late Dr. Chuba Okadigbo. He called all the members of the National Assembly who were Igbo to be there to receive us.

When we returned to Enugu, we took the certificate, right from the airport, to Odumegwu Ojukwu’s house to show him that we had accomplished the task. I want to also mention that Ohanaeze gave us blessings in the course of our struggle to have APGA registered. We left the house of Ojukwu, who gave us Moet Shandon as a gift and appreciation, for Dr. Alex Ekwueme’s Enugu residence and presented the same certificate. We took off from there to Ngwo, where we met with Chief C. C. Onoh and then we returned to Enugu to Justice Eze Ozobu’s house. Ozobu was then the Ohanaeze President General. We celebrated the certificate at his house.

It was there that he (Ozobu) made a very emotional statement that if he died after that day, he would tell Nnamdi Azikiwe and (Michael) Okpara that his eyes had seen a political party that would take our people to the centre stage.

A few days after, we were at Asaba, which was June 30, 2002. Coming to your question, it was at Asaba that fateful June 30, 2002, that Ozobu called Ikemba to say please Odumegwu go and join this party so that Igbo people will know that this party belongs to them. It was there that Ohanaeze announced that it would give me the title, Ogbatulu Enyi Ndigbo (the one that killed an elephant).

We went and continued mobilisation. Three months later, by September of the same year, Chief Odumegwu (many people seem to have forgotten all of these things that were published widely) brought out his membership card of All Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP) and tore it. You know he (Ojukwu) was given to drama. He tore the card and said he had ended his membership of ANPP and that he would announce his new party in due course.

A lot of negotiations and conversations took place on December 22, 2002. All this time, he had not joined. On December 24, based on my concern that we were entering the following year without a presidential candidate of the type that will lead the party (after all, I was old enough at 49 to be a presidential candidate), we met at Odumegwu’s house. Chief Chukwuemeka Ezeife was part of that meeting, but while we were waiting for Justice Ozobu, he said he was going back to Abuja and we excused him. Shortly after he left, Ozobu walked into Ikemba’s house. Dr. Joe Nworgu; Onwuka Ukwa; Chief H. B. Ogboko, the Publicity Secretary of Ohanaeze and Prince Richard Ozobu were there. Ozobu stood up from his seat, took Ikemba’s hand and put it on mine and said, ‘Ojeozi Ndigbo, go and make Odumegwu Ojukwu presidential candidate’. It was on December 24, 2002, and I said it was done. All I was waiting for was for the Ohanaeze to give the mandate. I used my Christmas day to write a speech and had a world press conference on December 26, where I proposed in the presence of a capacity hall that we were going to propose Chief Odumegwu Ojukwu as our presidential candidate. Our convention was already slated for January 10, 2003.

It was there that I made the much-quoted statement because I already knew that President (Olusegun) Obasanjo was going for a second term and General Muhammadu Buhari was going to be the candidate of APP. I said ‘I foresee the 2003 presidential election as an encounter of three generals, a general from the North, a general from the West and a wise general from the East.’ The hall erupted and it became a quotable quote of APGA.

It was at Abuja that Ojukwu’s membership card was produced. Mazi Okwu wrote it to complete the filing of his (Ojukwu’s) nomination form to be our presidential candidate. On January 10, 2003, at the old Parade Ground, Abuja, as national chairman of APGA, I raised his (Ojukwu’s) hand on one hand and on the left hand, that of Bayero, who was his running mate from Kano. That was how the journey begin.

 

 

Nnamdi Kanu Lawyer Misfired – Emeka Ugwuonye

NNAMDI KANU TRIAL: A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT HAPPENED IN COURT, NOVEMBER 10, 2021
(By Emeka Ugwuonye, Esquire)

THE FACT:
Nnamdi Kanu’s lawyers about 8 of them arrived the court by 9:00am. They were all allowed into the court without a glitch. But one man in their team, Bruce Fein, an American lawyer who arrived with the team of Nnamdi Kanu’s lawyers, was denied entry to the courtroom. Some other important people were denied entry to the court. Chief Ezeife, leading a senior Nigerian lawyer, who was robed, and some Igbo traditional rulers who came to observe the trial on behalf of Ohaneze, were not allowed into the courtroom. The reason given by the security officials was that the space in the court was not enough to accommodate anyone who was not essential part of the proceedings. Barrister Ejiofor went into the courtroom. Before entering the courtroom, he assured Bruce Fein that he would inform the judge that he, Fein, should come inside the courtroom. So, Fein was standing in the hallway outside the courtroom, while Ejiofor and other lawyers were inside the courtroom seated and waiting for the arrival of their client and the judge.

By 9:52am, Nnamdi Kanu was led into the court. Before he entered the courtroom, he saw Bruce Fein in the hallway outside the courtroom and Bruce Fein informed him that he was not allowed into the courtroom. When Nnamdi Kanu entered the courtroom, all his lawyers or most of his lawyers, including Ejiofor, rose to greet him. They all hustled to take selfies with him, taking turns to snuggle next to him and pose for selfies and short videos. It was more like the uncontrollable excitement of a bunch of groupies in the presence of a rare celebrity.

By 10:20am, the judge entered the court and the case was called. Ejiofor immediately stood up to raise a preliminary objection. He called the attention of the judge to the fact that Bruce Fein was not allowed into the courtroom. The court told him that there was no reason why Bruce Fein must be inside the courtroom. The judge reminded him that Bruce Fein was not a lawyer in her court and was not entitled to audience from the court. Ejiofor insisted. The judge ruled him out on Bruce Fein issue, and made to proceed to the matter of the day. Suddenly without warning to other lawyers or to Nnamdi Kanu, Ejiofor told the court that since it was not going to let Bruce Fein in, he and his fellow defense lawyers were walking out. He packed his books and started leaving the court. Other defense lawyers in the case rose and followed him. That was how they walked out of court. Even Nnamdi Kanu was confused. He did not see that coming.

One of the lawyers in the defense team immediately felt that this was wrong and he tried to stay behind. But it was too late. It happened too fast.

ANALYSIS:
The question on my mind when I heard this was whether it was a spontaneous event or whether Ejiofor had planned it ahead of time. Naturally, I began to ask questions and to investigate. I discovered that what happened in court yesterday was well planned by Ejiofor. The following factors must be considered:

(1) Ejiofor knew ahead of time that Bruce Fein would not be allowed into the courtroom. He knew from previous hearings that many important people who come to that court to witness the trial are now allowed to enter. So, it was not a surprise to him that Bruce Fein would not be allowed in.

(2) Bruce Fein was previously denied access to that court on the October hearing date. Also, Bruce Fein was denied access when he went to visit Nnamdi in prison. According to Bruce Fein, he was denied access four times before yesterday. So, again, Ejiofor knew that Bruce Fein would be denied access. It did not come to him as a surprise. He could have discussed it with other lawyers and clients ahead of time, if he had wanted to.

(3) Bruce Fein was denied access by 9:00am. Ejiofor walked out of court by 10:30am. So, Ejiofor had one and half hours (90 minutes) to process the information and manage his reaction. There was no need to react in the heat of passion, as he appeared to have done. There was ample time to discuss it with Bruce Fein, Nnamdi and other lawyers and agree on what they should do. The sudden reaction was a farce.

(4) Since Bruce Fein had been denied access on four previous occasions, Ejiofor had an opportunity to make a written application to court with an affidavit explaining to court why it was important for Bruce Fein to be allowed in. That issue could have been addressed ahead of time in a cool and nondramatic fashion. Ejiofor did not do that.

(5) Ejiofor staged the dramatic walkout with a calculated intention to abort the yesterday’s trial. There are two likely reasons for that:

(a) In recent times, Nnamdi Kanu had indicated his preference for Barrister Aloy Ejimakor to be the one to handle the argument in court. In other words, while Ejiofor wanted to be designated in the media and in public as the lead counsel, Nnamdi Kanu wanted Ejimakor to be the lead counsel inside the courtroom. I learnt that this did not sit well with Ejiofor, who has been exploiting that status of the lead counsel. This topic came up again during the recent visit of Ejiofor, Ejimakor and Nnamdi’s relative to the DSS detention. Though, I did not hear this directly from any of the parties, someone Nnamdi’s brother confided in share this with me and it sounded logical. Nnamdi was vehement in wanting Ejimakor, not Ejiofor, to be the one to address the court henceforth on his case. If the proceedings had gone ahead yesterday, there would have been a dramatic change when Ejimakor would have taken over the function of addressing the court. Ejiofor scuttled the proceedings to avoid that transfer of role becoming effective.

(b) It has become increasingly doubtful that Ejiofor could remain an effective counsel for Nnamdi Kanu, given the sensitive nature of the case. Two times now, Ejiofor had clashes or bloody encounters with the Nigerian police which resulted in death of people. On the first occasion, Ejiofor himself claimed that 27 IPOB members guarding his house were killed by the police and he was declared wanted because two police officers died in that violent clash, which was attributed to Ejiofor. Also, Ejiofor’s house was burnt down in that incident. Before that case could be resolved, there was a second incident in which Ejiofor alleged that some policemen came to kill him, but killed his PA instead. These events are not minor events. It is doubtful that a person declared wanted and involved in allegations of many unlawful deaths would be fit, focused and disposed to lead the defense in a case like Nnamdi Kanu’s. Ejiofor needed to sort all these issues out and make sure that his own controversies would not overshadow the trial of Nnamdi Kanu. If it was a small case, then it would not matter. But this is a very big case.

(c) Another potential exposure Ejiofor has is based on the fact that he has been more than a lawyer to IPOB. A lawyer’s role is to defend a client on a case that is based on facts that the lawyer has no involvement in. If a lawyer can be called even as a witness to a criminal trial, he should not be a lawyer in such trial. So any involvement of the lawyer in the facts that gave rise to the offence or allegations, even as a witness, is enough to disqualify the lawyer. Ejiofor was Nnamdi Kanu’s lawyer in 2017. He was their lawyer before IPOB was proscribed. He stayed in touch and communication with them throughout. He even had IPOB boys guarding his house. Ejiofor actually became a leader in IPOB and a commander of IPOB members with training on how to perform a guard duty on a high profile IPOB figure like Ejiofor. Ejiofor was advising Nnamdi and IPOB at the time ESN was set up. You cannot be representing a client and the same client is engaged in activities that would become a crime. That means that at the very least, you can be called as a witness in any case brought against that client. Ejiofor discarded the veil of a lawyer and became an actor or at least a vital witness.

(d) With such exposure to arrest and prosecution, Ejiofor could be easily used as a double agent against Nnamdi Kanu. In other words, the DSS could approach him and say: “We can arrest and prosecute you for murder and other offences. But we will give you the option of working for us and giving us information on Nnamdi Kanu and using your position as his lawyer to ensure that he never gets quality legal representation”. To avoid arrest and prosecution, Ejiofor could have agreed to help the government against Nnamdi Kanu, but must do it in such a manner that no one would know.

Given the popularity Nnamdi Kanu enjoys especially among Igbo youths, being seen as the lead counsel in Nnamdi Kanu’s case is very good for an ambitious young lawyer like Ifeanyi Ejiofor. He would hang onto that position at all costs. But it is clear that he has been most ineffective as counsel. When Nnamdi Kanu was granted bail with so many stringent conditions, it was the duty of his lawyer to either vary those terms or ensure that his client would comply with them. He failed. No single application was made to vary the terms of bail. Yet, it was clear to everybody that Nnamdi Kanu would not or coule not keep to those terms.

Also, when IPOB was proscribed, it became a crime for them to operate as IPOB or for anyone to belong to that organization. A good lawyer would have advised his clients to change their name and operate under another organization’s name, a new name. It was only IPOB that was proscribed. If they changed name, that would have given them some respite while they are fighting to be unproscribed. Ejiofor did not understand this. Instead, he allowed the increasing and needless confrontations between his clients and the government of Nigeria in series of suicidal and counterproductive missions.

Further, as counsel, Ejiofor had a duty to prevent or advise against some of the extremes of IPOB and Nnamdi Kanu statements and actions. Example: for Nnamdi Kanu to order the stoning of the Ohaneze leader, or to threaten to assassinate the family of the Commissioner of Police for Abia State, or to make so many dangerous utterances, it meant he did not have the benefit of wise counsel. Nnamdi Kanu is not a lawyer. He might not have understood the full legal implications of his utterances and activities. It was the duty of his counsel to keep him in check by making sure that he was properly advised and properly guided. But Ejiofor either did not know his duties or he did not wish to perform them.

The present predicament that Nnamdi Kanu faces can be easily traced to poor quality or ineffective representation of counsel. Why have a lawyer and be acting like a blind man? What then was the purpose of having a lawyer if that lawyer cannot guide you? I have no doubt in my mind that Ejiofor has been a disaster as a lawyer to Nnamdi Kanu and IPOB. The damage he caused is now too late to cure. But changing him will be Nnamdi Kanu’s best decision. And that will actually help Nnamdi Kanu in his cases, particularly on his bail application. The new lawyer will make an impact on the court by saying to the judge: “My Lord, it is clear that my client has not been properly advised by his former lawyers. Hence he did not advert to the consequences of certain actions. However, now that I am here to be his counsel, I can assure this court that there will be a difference. If granted bail, my Lord, I will take it a challenge on my honor to make sure he complies with any terms that this court might deem proper and reasonable in the circumstance to impose”.

Breaking :Biafra Customary Government Congratulates Soludo

The Chairman of Governing Council of the Customary Government of  Biafra – Barr Emeka Emekesiri has sent a letter of congratulation to Prof Chukwuma Soludo on his victory at the poll to emerge as the Governor-elect of Anambra State. In a statement released to BVI Channel 1 online ,Barr Emeka reminded the Governor -elect that the entire Igbo race expected him to defend and protect the interest of Ndigbo still living in Nigeria.The statement reads in full ”On behalf of all the Biafrans and Biafran activists who believe in the struggle for self-determination by the rule of law, politics and diplomacy, the Customary Government of Biafra congratulates Your Excellency on the victory you have won at the polls to emerge as the Executive Governor of Anambra State.

We make bold to say that it is a well-deserved victory. In fact, we would have been surprised if you did not win the election with a very wide margin. Indeed, the Igbo adage is true that “anya ma oka kara aka”. Most importantly, we give glory to The Lord God Almighty who made it possible and frustrated the evil schemers and enemies of progress.

You came at the right time. Anambra State is the cradle and head of the Igbo Nation. Your emergence as the Executive Governor of Anambra State is a blessing to the Igbo Nation.  We see you as a man on a divine mission to emancipate our nation. You headed the Committee that designed and produced the Economic Master Plan for the development of the South East Region under the leadership of Chief Barr John Nnia Nwodo as the President-General of Ohanaeze Ndigbo.

The Economic Development Master Plan is still in the cooler. Now is the time to implement the Master Plan and transform the whole South East Region into a Regional Bloc that can be described as a better Japan in Africa. For us to achieve this, there must be peace in the whole South East Region.

By this election, you have become the Chief Security Officer of Anambra State with power to protect your region and make peace to reign. We want the example of Anambra State Election to spread to all parts of Eastern Nigeria.

You are aware of our struggle for self-determination starting with Regional Government. It was for this reason that the Customary Government presented the Biafran Memorandum to the National Assembly for restructuring by way of devolution of power to the 6 geopolitical regions so that every Region will govern itself and develop at its own pace within Nigeria until such a time as the people shall decide their political status in a referendum.

The Biafran activists under the Customary Government campaigned for your election and voted for you because you believe in our cause. We have maintained our position on the question of national identity that we are Biafrans by indigenous identity but Nigerians by citizenship until we gain independence from Nigeria by due process of law and political diplomacy.

We are not ashamed of who we are. We are still in Court with the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the Attorney General of the Federation on the issue of self-determination and our documents are in the National Assembly arguing our case.

By this Election in Anambra State, we have proved those Biafran activists wrong who said that votes do not count in Nigeria. We have proved that our votes can count if we vote and insist that there should be no rigging and imposition of stooges and errand boys in our Region. We believe in the use of due process of law and politics to achieve self-determination beginning with Regional Government as practised in the United Kingdom where there are four nations in one country.

In our memorandum presented to the National Assembly, we recommended the British model of political engineering and advocated for restructuring by way of devolution of power to the 6 geopolitical regions in Nigeria so that every region would govern itself and develop at its own pace for now until such a time as the people would conduct a referendum to decide their political future. Let us organize and manage ourselves as a regional bloc first before taking the next step if necessary. Let us do the first thing first.

You were the first Igbo leader who stood up in Abuja and announced the existence of the Customary Government of Biafra during the presentation of the book by Hon Barr Chudi Offodile on the Politics of Biafra and the Future of Nigeria. You were not afraid to tell Abuja and the rest of the world that we had established our Customary Government by the authority of the Elders of Biafraland.

If the Houses of Assembly in the North could pass their Bill and establish the Sharia Government and govern themselves as a people by the use of the Sharia Law in addition to the statute laws of the States, certainly we can do the same and govern ourselves as a people by the use of the Customary Law in addition to the statute laws of the States. We can develop our Region within Nigeria and become the economic powerbase of the entire Africa. Yes, we can.

Your Excellency, we pledge our support to your government and promise to work with you to achieve your mission and vision for the Igbo Nation and the Biafrans in general” the statement concluded.
Maureen Okafor writes for BVI Channel 1 Online

 

Anambra 21 : APGA Will Play A Big Role In National Politics – Soludo

The governor-elect of Anambra state, Chukwuma Soludo, has pledged that the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) is “going to work very hard” to drive the party’s popularity in other parts of the country. Soludo revealed this during an interview session with Arise TV.

The former CBN governor was, on Tuesday, announced the winner of the Anambra governorship election.

He polled 112,229 votes on the platform APGA to defeat his two major rivals — Valentine Ozigbo of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) who got 53,807 votes, and Andy Uba of the All Progressives Congress (APC) who secured 43,285 votes.

However, APGA, having ruled Anambra for 15 consecutive years, has not been able to establish a foothold in other parts of the country.

Speaking on this, Soludo said the party should not be categorised as a regional party, adding that it will soon spread across that country.

He said APGA will “mainstream our neo-progressivism” and get Nigerians to buy into the ideas of the party and “begin to flood into the party”.

He said APGA will leverage on its home support to build a “systematic approach to getting the rest of the country”.

“AGPA happens to be the first progressive party that was registered in Nigeria. And its name says it all, All Progressives Grand Alliance. It starts in 2002 before others started adding progressives to their names. The first election that it won happened to be in the southeast. Just Like Action Congress (AC), the first election that they won happened to be in the southwest, and (some people) began to see it as Yoruba party — forgetting that its first presidential candidate was Atiku Abubakar,” the governor-elect said.

“Ditto for APGA the first election it won was in Anambra and people began to have that toga. We are going to work very hard to mainstream our neo-progressivism and we’re the ones with the neo-progressive ideas, mandate, agenda. The moment Nigerians begin to see with clarity where the uniqueness of APGA and why the APGA agenda, people from all walks are going to begin to flood into the party.

“We’ve won elections sporadically in some parts of the country but we’re now going to build on that to really have a systematic approach to getting the rest of the country.”

SOUTHEAST GOVERNORS CONGRATULATE PROF. CHARLES CHUKWUMA SOLUDO ON HIS VICTORY

 

May I, on behalf of South-East Governors:

1. Congratulate Prof. Charles Chukwuma Soludo on his victory in the just-concluded Anambra governorship election.

2. Congratulate all other candidates that participated in the election for their efforts and peaceful conduct during and after the election. I believe that God rules in the affairs of men.

3. Urge Prof. Soludo to please, extend healing and loving hands to all the candidates in the election so that together, you will continue to contribute to the progress of the state from where His Excellency, Chief Willie Obiano would stop. After every election, party politics should be left to political parties while good governance takes the centre stage for the good of the people.

4. May I also congratulate one of us, Governor Willie Obiano for a successful governorship election in Anambra state. God has ordained you to finish strong and well.

5. Testimonies available on the conduct of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) during the election speak greatly of their excellent job. Let me therefore, congratulate the commission for both a great job and their courage in conducting the election.

6. We are grateful to all security chiefs and their men for their excellent job in the conduct of the election. From available accounts, they all played their roles excellently within their rules of engagement. This has unarguable boosted the public confidence in our security system.

7. Our gratitude goes to all our religious leaders, our political leaders, our traditional fathers, many stakeholders of South East, and Mr. Nnamdi Kanu’s Lawyer for their efforts in ensuring that the sit-at-home order and threats against holding the election were aborted. I believe that with the same spirit, we will work together for a political solution in handling our present situation in South East.

8. We thank Mr. President, H.E. Muhammadu Buhari, GCFR so much for his efforts and neutrality in the success of the Anambra election. Mr. President, this is just you and you have once again demonstrated that you are a true democrat with a great commitment to bequeath to the nation an impeccable electoral process. Thank you for the security agencies, INEC officials, and the safety of our people during and after the election.

9. Mr. President, please, as a follow-up to your presidential delegation to South-East this year on the solution to the situation of South-East, may we inform you that we South-East leaders have been working so hard for an amicable solution. All leaders of South-East strongly wish to present to Mr. President, some suggestions for a possible political solution over our present situation. After Our next meeting, we shall be writing to request for an appointment with Mr. President on this matter. We thank you Mr. President for your kind disposition to listen to our leaders for a possible amicable resolution of all contending issues in South-East.

10. Finally, we thank God almighty for saving the lives of our people and all those involved in the election. The same God will do more for our people and Nigeria. Amen.

Signed:

Engr. David Nweze Umahi, FNSE, FNATE
Governor of Ebonyi State and
Chairman of South East Governors’ Forum, For South-East Governors.